These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

229 related items for PubMed ID: 17204898

  • 1. Predictive measures of directional benefit part 2: verification of different approaches to estimating directional benefit.
    Dittberner AB, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):46-61. PubMed ID: 17204898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Predictive measures of directional benefit part 1: estimating the directivity index on a manikin.
    Dittberner AB, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):26-45. PubMed ID: 17204897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Directional hearing aid based on array technology.
    Soede W, Bilsen FA, Berkhout AJ, Verschuure J.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Feb; 38():20-7. PubMed ID: 8153561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T, Henry P, Gnewikow D.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Oct; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation.
    van der Beek FB, Soede W, Frijns JH.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 17204902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults.
    Neuman AC, Wroblewski M, Hajicek J, Rubinstein A.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Clinical measures of hearing aid directivity: assumption, accuracy, and reliability.
    Wu YH, Bentler RA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Apr; 33(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 21826003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Development and assessment of two fixed-array microphones for use with hearing aids.
    Bilsen FA, Soede W, Berkhout AJ.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993 Apr; 30(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 8263830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Measuring real-ear signal-to-noise ratio: application to directional hearing aids.
    Bell SL, Creeke SA, Lutman ME.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Mar; 49(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 20151932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S, Dillon H.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Using hearing aid adaptive directional microphones to enhance cochlear implant performance.
    Chung K, Zeng FG.
    Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 250(1-2):27-37. PubMed ID: 19450437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of in-the-ear microphone directionality on sound direction identification.
    Chung K, Neuman AC, Higgins M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2264-75. PubMed ID: 18397031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM, Bowditch S, Anderson MJ, May B, Cox KM, Niparko JK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A, Van Deun L, Eftaxiadis K, Laneau J, Moonen M, van Dijk B, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
    Ricketts TA, Henry PP, Hornsby BW.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Establishment of age-specific normative data for the canadian French version of the hearing in noise test for children.
    Vaillancourt V, Laroche C, Giguère C, Soli SD.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):453-66. PubMed ID: 18349705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.