These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1114 related items for PubMed ID: 17205029

  • 1. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Laupland K, Manns B, Doig C.
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature.
    Delaney A, Bagshaw SM, Ferland A, Manns B, Laupland KB, Doig CJ.
    Crit Care; 2005 Oct 05; 9(5):R575-82. PubMed ID: 16277721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.
    Shea B, Bouter LM, Grimshaw JM, Francis D, Ortiz Z, Wells GA, Tugwell PS, Boers M.
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Jan 05; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16267878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.
    Kelly KD, Travers A, Dorgan M, Slater L, Rowe BH.
    Ann Emerg Med; 2001 Nov 05; 38(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 11679863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.
    van Driel ML, De Sutter A, De Maeseneer J, Christiaens T.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug 05; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.
    MacDonald SL, Canfield SE, Fesperman SF, Dahm P.
    J Urol; 2010 Aug 05; 184(2):648-53. PubMed ID: 20639030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Increased number of systematic reviews in the Netherlands in the period 1991-2000].
    Grootens KP, Assendelft WJ, Overbeke AJ.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Nov 08; 147(45):2226-30. PubMed ID: 14640061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?
    Shea B, Boers M, Grimshaw JM, Hamel C, Bouter LM.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jun 13; 6():27. PubMed ID: 16772030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM, Swiontkowski MF, Cook DJ.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug 13; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster.
    Sampson M, Shojania KG, Garritty C, Horsley T, Ocampo M, Moher D.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun 13; 61(6):531-6. PubMed ID: 18471656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An analysis of systematic reviews indicated low incorpororation of results from clinical trial quality assessment.
    de Craen AJ, van Vliet HA, Helmerhorst FM.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar 13; 58(3):311-3. PubMed ID: 15718121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 56.