These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

415 related items for PubMed ID: 17210165

  • 1. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
    Sclafani A.
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar 16; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides.
    Sclafani A.
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr 15; 87(4):745-56. PubMed ID: 16529783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.
    Sclafani A, Ackroff K.
    Physiol Behav; 2017 May 01; 173():188-199. PubMed ID: 28192132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
    Pinhas A, Aviel M, Koen M, Gurgov S, Acosta V, Israel M, Kakuriev L, Guskova E, Fuzailov I, Touzani K, Sclafani A, Bodnar RJ.
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan 18; 105(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 21945373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.
    Sclafani A, Ackroff K.
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Mar 01; 140():156-63. PubMed ID: 25497884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Sucrose motivation in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking.
    Sclafani A.
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr 15; 87(4):734-44. PubMed ID: 16530236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Contribution of orosensory stimulation to strain differences in oil intake by mice.
    Glendinning JI, Feld N, Goodman L, Bayor R.
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Oct 20; 95(3):476-83. PubMed ID: 18691606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Ghrelin signaling is not essential for sugar or fat conditioned flavor preferences in mice.
    Sclafani A, Touzani K, Ackroff K.
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Oct 01; 149():14-22. PubMed ID: 26003495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions.
    Sclafani A, Glendinning JI.
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2005 Sep 01; 289(3):R712-20. PubMed ID: 15845881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.
    Ackroff K, Sclafani A.
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Oct 15; 165():286-90. PubMed ID: 27526998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Genetic variance contributes to ingestive processes: a survey of eleven inbred mouse strains for fat (Intralipid) intake.
    Lewis SR, Dym C, Chai C, Singh A, Kest B, Bodnar RJ.
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Jan 30; 90(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 17028044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.
    Bachmanov AA, Tordoff MG, Beauchamp GK.
    Chem Senses; 2001 Sep 30; 26(7):905-13. PubMed ID: 11555485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Oral, post-oral and genetic interactions in sweet appetite.
    Sclafani A.
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Nov 30; 89(4):525-30. PubMed ID: 16647093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
    Kraft TT, Huang D, Lolier M, Warshaw D, LaMagna S, Natanova E, Sclafani A, Bodnar RJ.
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Jan 01; 153():64-9. PubMed ID: 26485292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Flavor preference conditioning as a function of fat source.
    Ackroff K, Lucas F, Sclafani A.
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Jul 21; 85(4):448-60. PubMed ID: 15990126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.