These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
170 related items for PubMed ID: 1721189
1. Comparison of titanium-mesh and porous disc electrodes for epicardial defibrillation. Rubin L, Rosenberg D, Parsonnet V, Villaneuva A, Ferrara-Ryan M. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):1860-4. PubMed ID: 1721189 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative efficacy of subcutaneous mesh and plate electrodes for nonthoracotomy canine defibrillation. Nogami A, Takahashi A, Nitta J, Aonuma K, Iesaka Y, Hiroe M, Marumo F, Hiraoka M. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Sep; 14(9):1402-10. PubMed ID: 1720534 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations. Fotuhi PC, Ideker RE, Idriss SF, Callihan RL, Walker RG, Alt EU. Circulation; 1995 Nov 15; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Importance of electrode design, lead configuration and impedance for successful low energy transcatheter atrial defibrillation in dogs. Kalman JM, Power JM, Chen JM, Farish SJ, Tonkin AM. J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Oct 15; 22(4):1199-206. PubMed ID: 8409061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of a new defibrillation pathway--the tongue-epigastric route. I. Experimental studies in dogs. Kerber RE, Hoyt R, Aronson A, Kieso R, Melton J. J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Nov 15; 2(5):966-72. PubMed ID: 6630773 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between two versus three patches single pulse shock defibrillation in pigs. Montenero AS, Bombardieri G, Barilaro C, Di Francesco P, Bertazzoni S, Santarelli P, Pisanó E, Alessandrini F, Possati G. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Feb 15; 14(2 Pt 2):362-5. PubMed ID: 1706853 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved defibrillation threshold with a new epicardial carbon electrode compared with a standard epicardial titanium patch. Alt EU, Fotuhi PC, Callihan RL, Rollins DL, Mestre E, Combs MP, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Circulation; 1995 Jan 15; 91(2):445-50. PubMed ID: 7805249 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The implantable automatic cardioverter-defibrillator]. Klein H, Tröster J, Trappe HJ, Becht I, Siclari F. Herz; 1990 Apr 15; 15(2):111-25. PubMed ID: 2188891 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Epicardial versus parietal pericardial defibrillation. Rubin L, Hudson P. Am J Emerg Med; 1985 Mar 15; 3(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 3970772 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental evaluation and initial clinical application of new self-adhesive defibrillation electrodes. Kerber RE, Martins JB, Ferguson DW, Jensen SR, Parke JD, Kieso R, Melton J. Int J Cardiol; 1985 May 15; 8(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 3997292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of opening the thorax on defibrillation threshold in canines. Kallok MJ. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1989 Jan 15; 12(1 Pt 1):70-9. PubMed ID: 2464813 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of defibrillation probability of success curves for an endocardial lead configuration with and without an inactive epicardial patch. Callihan RL, Idriss SF, Dahl RW, Wolf PD, Smith WM, Ideker RE. J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 May 15; 25(6):1373-9. PubMed ID: 7722136 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical efficacy of shock waveforms and lead configurations for defibrillation. Jung W, Manz M, Moosdorf R, Spehl S, Wolpert C, Korte T, Lüderitz B. Am Heart J; 1994 Apr 15; 127(4 Pt 2):985-93. PubMed ID: 8160603 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]