These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1034 related items for PubMed ID: 17219155

  • 1. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W, Trimech A, Haddad A, Hajjaji A, Saidani Z, Faleh R, Sakouhi M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R, Greaves PC.
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M, Pflum J, Howard D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
    Krithika KS, Aggarwal N, Suri V.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA, Loughney AD, Weir CJ, Barber JW.
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA, Oladokun A, Olayemi O, Adeniji OI, Odukogbe AA, Ogunbode O, Aimakhu CO, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F, Venturini P, Verocchi G, Volpe A.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr 01; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY, Ming H, Lee JC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan 01; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
    Ayad IA.
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002 Jan 01; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Saxena P, Puri M, Bajaj M, Mishra A, Trivedi SS.
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul 01; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study.
    Nanda S, Singhal SR, Papneja A.
    Trop Doct; 2007 Jan 01; 37(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 17326881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of intracervical and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in patients with an unfavourable cervix.
    Srisomboon J, Piyamongkol W, Aiewsakul P.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1997 Mar 01; 80(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 9175387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W, Dudenhausen JW, Hanel C, Chen FC.
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct 01; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Oral misoprostol vs. intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial.
    Gherman RB, Browning J, O'Boyle A, Goodwin TM.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jul 01; 46(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 11499184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Owolabi AT, Kuti O, Ogunlola IO.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug 01; 25(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16234141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for pre-induction cervical ripening at-term.
    Chitrakar NS.
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2012 Jan 01; 10(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 22929629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
    How HY, Leaseburge L, Khoury JC, Siddiqi TA, Spinnato JA, Sibai BM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct 01; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming.
    Tan TC, Yan SY, Chua TM, Biswas A, Chong YS.
    BJOG; 2010 Sep 01; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS, Savage K, Lincoln T, Owen J.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul 01; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 52.