These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


453 related items for PubMed ID: 17220725

  • 21. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography.
    Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Aug 02; 46(3):552-7. PubMed ID: 16053973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Quantification of coronary stenosis by dual source computed tomography in patients: a comparative study with intravascular ultrasound and invasive angiography.
    Feuchtner G, Loureiro R, Bezerra H, Rocha-Filho JA, Sarwar A, Pflederer T, Marwan M, Petranovic M, Raffel CO, Brady TB, Jang IK, Achenbach S, Cury RC.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan 02; 81(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 21227613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Visual and automatic grading of coronary artery stenoses with 64-slice CT angiography in reference to invasive angiography.
    Busch S, Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F, Knez A, Reiser MF, Becker CR.
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jun 02; 17(6):1445-51. PubMed ID: 17180326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Quantification of coronary artery stenoses: comparison of 64-slice and dual source CT angiography with cardiac catheterization].
    Busch S, Nikolaou K, Johnson T, Rist C, Knez A, Reiser M, Becker C.
    Radiologe; 2007 Apr 02; 47(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 17287946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Coronary artery bypass graft imaging using ECG-gated multislice computed tomography: comparison with catheter angiography.
    Moore RK, Sampson C, MacDonald S, Moynahan C, Groves D, Chester MR.
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Sep 02; 60(9):990-8. PubMed ID: 16124981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Automated quantification of stenosis severity on 64-slice CT: a comparison with quantitative coronary angiography.
    Boogers MJ, Schuijf JD, Kitslaar PH, van Werkhoven JM, de Graaf FR, Boersma E, van Velzen JE, Dijkstra J, Adame IM, Kroft LJ, de Roos A, Schreur JH, Heijenbrok MW, Jukema JW, Reiber JH, Bax JJ.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jul 02; 3(7):699-709. PubMed ID: 20633847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Coronary artery anomalies: incidence, pathophysiology, clinical relevance and role of diagnostic imaging.
    Cademartiri F, Runza G, Luccichenti G, Galia M, Mollet NR, Alaimo V, Brambilla V, Gualerzi M, Coruzzi P, Midiri M, Lagalla R.
    Radiol Med; 2006 Apr 02; 111(3):376-91. PubMed ID: 16683085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Diagnostic accuracy in coronary stenosis: comparison between visual score and quantitative analysis (quantitative computed tomographic angiography) in coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography-coronary angiography and quantitative analysis (quantitative coronary angiography) in conventional coronary angiography.
    Malagò R, D'Onofrio M, Tavella D, Mantovani W, Brunelli S, Pezzato A, Caliari G, Nicolì L, Benussi P, Mucelli RP.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Apr 02; 34(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 20861765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Comparison of reconstruction intervals in routine ECG-pulsed 64-row-MSCT coronary angiography in frequency controlled patients.
    Frydrychowicz A, Pache G, Saueressig U, Föll D, Kotter E, Langer M, Bley TA.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007 Apr 02; 30(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 17086457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Accuracy of 16-slice multi-detector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: assessment of cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions.
    Cury RC, Ferencik M, Achenbach S, Pomerantsev E, Nieman K, Moselewski F, Abbara S, Jang IK, Brady TJ, Hoffmann U.
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar 02; 57(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16442256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Quantification of coronary artery stenosis with 16-slice MSCT in patients before CABG surgery: comparison to standard invasive coronary angiography.
    Probst C, Kovacs A, Schmitz C, Schiller W, Schild H, Welz A.
    Heart Surg Forum; 2005 Mar 02; 8(1):E42-6. PubMed ID: 15769714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Correlation of duplex sonographic stenosis grading by means of cross-sectional analysis and MR-tomographic blood volume flow quantification in unilateral stenosis of the internal carotid artery].
    Neff KW, Kilian AK, Meairs S, Düber C.
    Rofo; 2005 Jul 02; 177(7):992-9. PubMed ID: 15973602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. CT vs conventional angiography in unselected patients with suspected coronary heart disease.
    Tan KT, Reed D, Howe J, Challenor V, Gibson M, McGann G.
    Int J Cardiol; 2007 Sep 14; 121(1):125-6. PubMed ID: 17123650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Quantitative measurements of coronary arterial stenosis, plaque geometry, and composition are highly reproducible with a standardized coronary arterial computed tomographic approach in high-quality CT datasets.
    Rinehart S, Vazquez G, Qian Z, Murrieta L, Christian K, Voros S.
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2011 Sep 14; 5(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 21131252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.