These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1000 related items for PubMed ID: 17224031

  • 1. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Di Felice R, Rappelli G, Camaioni E, Cattani M, Meyer JM, Belser UC.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements.
    Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Tallents R, Moss M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Aug; 13(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12175370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS, Agar JR, Duncan JP, Taylor TD.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001 Aug; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vitro retentive strength of metal superstructures cemented to solid abutments.
    Rappelli G, Corso M, Coccia E, Camaioni E, Di Felice R, Procaccini M.
    Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Mar; 57(3):95-101. PubMed ID: 18427377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV, Conrad R, Engelmeier RL, Gerngross P, Paravina R, Perezous L, Powers JM.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y, Yamashita J, Shotwell JL, Chong KH, Wang HL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Retention of gold alloy crowns cemented with traditional and resin cements.
    Pinzón LM, Frey GN, Winkler MM, Tate WH, Burgess JO, Powers JM.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009 Jun; 22(4):351-3. PubMed ID: 19639070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE, Richards LC, Abbott JR.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The influence of incisal veneering porcelain thickness of two metal ceramic crown systems on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Geminiani A, Lee H, Feng C, Ercoli C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 20416410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fibre-reinforced composite crowns luted to implant abutments via electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
    Rappelli G, Di Felice R, Scalise L, Coccia E, Pallotto L, Sorrentino R, Zarone F.
    Minerva Stomatol; 2012 Sep; 61(9):355-65. PubMed ID: 22976564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of surface conditioning on the retentiveness of titanium crowns over short implant abutments.
    Sadig WM, Al Harbi MW.
    Implant Dent; 2007 Dec; 16(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 18091167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
    Lewinstein I, Block L, Lehr Z, Ormianer Z, Matalon S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dimensional accuracy and retentive strength of a retrievable cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis.
    Randi AP, Hsu AT, Verga A, Kim JJ.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001 Dec; 16(4):547-56. PubMed ID: 11516002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Vertical discrepancy and microleakage of laser-sintered and vacuum-cast implant-supported structures luted with different cement types.
    Oyagüe RC, Sánchez-Turrión A, López-Lozano JF, Suárez-García MJ.
    J Dent; 2012 Feb; 40(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 22108101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Limkangwalmongkol P, Romberg E.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P, Gultekin BA, Aydin M, Yalcin S.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC, Turrión AS, Toledano M, Monticelli F, Osorio R.
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Jan; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
    Naik S, Tredwin CJ, Nesbit M, Setchell DJ, Moles DR.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP, Johnson GH, Phillips KM, Raigrodski AJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 50.