These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
328 related items for PubMed ID: 17224756
21. Intraocular pressure difference in Goldmann applanation tonometry versus Perkins hand-held applanation tonometry in overweight patients. dos Santos MG, Makk S, Berghold A, Eckhardt M, Haas A. Ophthalmology; 1998 Dec; 105(12):2260-3. PubMed ID: 9855157 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the digital tonometer TGDc-01 'PRA' and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Meyer MW, Gockeln R, Hoy L, Meyer A, Erb C. Ophthalmic Res; 2004 Dec; 36(5):250-4. PubMed ID: 15583430 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of rebound tonometer and Goldmann handheld applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Saenz-Frances F, Vizzeri G, Fernandez-Vidal A, Mendez-Hernandez C, Garcia-Sanchez J. J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 19142135 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Change in intraocular pressure measurement after myopic LASEK: a study evaluating goldmann, pascal and applanation resonance tonometry. Jóhannesson G, Hallberg P, Eklund A, Koskela T, Lindén C. J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 21654513 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative evaluation of Diaton and Goldmann applanation tonometers. Bali SJ, Bhartiya S, Sobti A, Dada T, Panda A. Ophthalmologica; 2012 Jan; 228(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 22398455 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of a new Goldmann applanation tonometer. Egli M, Goldblum D, Kipfer A, Rohrer K, Tappeiner C, Abegg M, Berger L, Schoetzau A, Iliev ME. Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jan; 96(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 21464035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Icare ONE rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with known or suspected glaucoma. Gandhi NG, Prakalapakorn SG, El-Dairi MA, Jones SK, Freedman SF. Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Nov; 154(5):843-849.e1. PubMed ID: 22840485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Dynamic contour tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement. Kamppeter BA, Jonas JB. Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 140(2):318-20. PubMed ID: 16086958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers. Harada Y, Hirose N, Kubota T, Tawara A. J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure in keratoconic eyes. Papastergiou GI, Kozobolis V, Siganos DS. J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):484-8. PubMed ID: 18794685 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Prospective comparison of the new indentation tonometer TGdC-01, the non-contact tonometer PT100 and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometer]. Müller A, Godenschweger L, Lang GE, Kampmeier J. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Sep; 221(9):762-8. PubMed ID: 15459844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs. Leiva M, Naranjo C, Peña MT. Vet Ophthalmol; 2006 Sep; 9(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16409240 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]