These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Mammography screening using independent double reading with consensus: is there a potential benefit for computer-aided detection? Skaane P, Kshirsagar A, Hofvind S, Jahr G, Castellino RA. Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr 01; 53(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 22287148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. Destounis SV, DiNitto P, Logan-Young W, Bonaccio E, Zuley ML, Willison KM. Radiology; 2004 Aug 01; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program. Hambly NM, McNicholas MM, Phelan N, Hargaden GC, O'Doherty A, Flanagan FL. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct 01; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial of screen-film versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading in population-based screening program: follow-up and final results of Oslo II study. Skaane P, Hofvind S, Skjennald A. Radiology; 2007 Sep 01; 244(3):708-17. PubMed ID: 17709826 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study. Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A. Radiology; 2003 Dec 01; 229(3):877-84. PubMed ID: 14576447 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study. Skaane P, Balleyguier C, Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Piguet JC, Young K, Niklason LT. Radiology; 2005 Oct 01; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the UK breast screening program and systematic review of published data. Vinnicombe S, Pinto Pereira SM, McCormack VA, Shiel S, Perry N, Dos Santos Silva IM. Radiology; 2009 May 01; 251(2):347-58. PubMed ID: 19401569 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms. Yang SK, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Cha JH, Kim SM, Kim SJ, Im JG. Radiology; 2007 Jul 01; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms. Ge J, Hadjiiski LM, Sahiner B, Wei J, Helvie MA, Zhou C, Chan HP. Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb 21; 52(4):981-1000. PubMed ID: 17264365 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of computer-aided detection applied to full-field digital mammography in detection of breast cancers. Sadaf A, Crystal P, Scaranelo A, Helbich T. Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar 21; 77(3):457-61. PubMed ID: 19875260 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography in Japanese population-based screening. Yamada T, Saito M, Ishibashi T, Tsuboi M, Matsuhashi T, Sato A, Saito H, Takahashi S, Onuki K, Ouchi N. Radiat Med; 2004 Mar 21; 22(6):408-12. PubMed ID: 15648457 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]