These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case. Obade CC. J Clin Ethics; 1990; 1(3):242-4. PubMed ID: 2132019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What does Cruzan mean to the practicing physician? White BD, Siegler M, Singer PA, Iserson KV. Arch Intern Med; 1991 May; 151(5):925-8. PubMed ID: 2025139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The ethics of Cruzan. Families, not states, should make treatment termination decisions. Brodeur D. Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):42-7. PubMed ID: 10107438 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan. Weir RF, Gostin L. JAMA; 1990 Oct 10; 264(14):1846-53. PubMed ID: 2402044 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Cruzan decision: an ethical perspective. Drane JF. Pa Med; 1990 Dec 10; 93(12):24-7. PubMed ID: 2274332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan. Karbal W. J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug 10; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]