These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1822 related items for PubMed ID: 17296378
1. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G, Cookson MS, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Baumgartner RG, Smith JA. J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS. J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience. Rozet F, Jaffe J, Braud G, Harmon J, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Vallancien G. J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain. Webster TM, Herrell SD, Chang SS, Cookson MS, Baumgartner RG, Anderson LW, Smith JA. J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):912-4; discussion 914. PubMed ID: 16093986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Retropubic, laparoscopic and robot-assisted total prostatectomies: comparison of postoperative course and histological and functional results based on a series of 86 prostatectomies]. Durand X, Vaessen C, Bitker MO, Richard F. Prog Urol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 18342158 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined inguinal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh during transperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a 4-year experience. Finley DS, Rodriguez E, Ahlering TE. J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1296-9; discussion 1299-300. PubMed ID: 17698133 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach. Salomon L, Levrel O, Anastasiadis AG, Saint F, de La Taille A, Cicco A, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002 Oct; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Link BA, Nelson R, Josephson DY, Yoshida JS, Crocitto LE, Kawachi MH, Wilson TG. J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y. Eur Urol; 2010 Mar; 57(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 19931979 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005. Hu JC, Hevelone ND, Ferreira MD, Lipsitz SR, Choueiri TK, Sanda MG, Earle CC. J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Schulze M, Teber D, Hatzinger M, Frede T. J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1689-93. PubMed ID: 12686809 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]