These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
267 related items for PubMed ID: 17296777
21. Whole genome single nucleotide polymorphism associations with feed intake and feed efficiency in beef cattle. Sherman EL, Nkrumah JD, Moore SS. J Anim Sci; 2010 Jan; 88(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19749024 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for feed intake and other traits in growing beef cattle, and opportunities for selection. Rolfe KM, Snelling WM, Nielsen MK, Freetly HC, Ferrell CL, Jenkins TG. J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3452-9. PubMed ID: 21622877 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Energy utilization in pigs selected for high and low residual feed intake. Barea R, Dubois S, Gilbert H, Sellier P, van Milgen J, Noblet J. J Anim Sci; 2010 Jun; 88(6):2062-72. PubMed ID: 20154162 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Nutrient utilisation and methane emissions in Sahiwal calves differing in residual feed intake. Sharma VC, Mahesh MS, Mohini M, Datt C, Nampoothiri VM. Arch Anim Nutr; 2014 Jun; 68(5):345-57. PubMed ID: 25156936 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of refined soy oil or whole soybeans on intake, methane output, and performance of young bulls. Jordan E, Kenny D, Hawkins M, Malone R, Lovett DK, O'Mara FP. J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2418-25. PubMed ID: 16908646 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of sward dry matter digestibility on methane production, ruminal fermentation, and microbial populations of zero-grazed beef cattle. Hart KJ, Martin PG, Foley PA, Kenny DA, Boland TM. J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3342-50. PubMed ID: 19542500 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Phenotypic and genetic relationships among feeding behavior traits, feed intake, and residual feed intake in steers fed grower and finisher diets. Durunna ON, Wang Z, Basarab JA, Okine EK, Moore SS. J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3401-9. PubMed ID: 21642495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Estimating feed efficiency: evaluation of mathematical models to predict individual intakes of steers fed in group pens. Cruz GD, Trovo JB, Oltjen JW, Sainz RD. J Anim Sci; 2011 May; 89(5):1640-9. PubMed ID: 21278119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Variation in residual feed intake in Holstein-Friesian dairy heifers in southern Australia. Williams YJ, Pryce JE, Grainger C, Wales WJ, Linden N, Porker M, Hayes BJ. J Dairy Sci; 2011 Sep; 94(9):4715-25. PubMed ID: 21854946 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Enteric methane emissions from low- and high-residual feed intake beef heifers measured using GreenFeed and respiration chamber techniques. Alemu AW, Vyas D, Manafiazar G, Basarab JA, Beauchemin KA. J Anim Sci; 2017 Aug; 95(8):3727-3737. PubMed ID: 28805902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Application of biological simulation models in estimating feed efficiency of finishing steers. Williams CB. J Anim Sci; 2010 Jul; 88(7):2523-9. PubMed ID: 20348372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Measures of methane production and their phenotypic relationships with dry matter intake, growth, and body composition traits in beef cattle. Herd RM, Arthur PF, Donoghue KA, Bird SH, Bird-Gardiner T, Hegarty RS. J Anim Sci; 2014 Nov; 92(11):5267-74. PubMed ID: 25349368 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of wet corn gluten feed and roughage levels on performance, carcass characteristics, and feeding behavior of feedlot cattle. Parsons CH, Vasconcelos JT, Swingle RS, Defoor PJ, Nunnery GA, Salyer GB, Galyean ML. J Anim Sci; 2007 Nov; 85(11):3079-89. PubMed ID: 17609466 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]