These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

397 related items for PubMed ID: 17298840

  • 1. A geometric morphometric analysis of heterochrony in the cranium of chimpanzees and bonobos.
    Lieberman DE, Carlo J, Ponce de León M, Zollikofer CP.
    J Hum Evol; 2007 Jun; 52(6):647-62. PubMed ID: 17298840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Heterochrony and geometric morphometrics: a comparison of cranial growth in Pan paniscus versus Pan troglodytes.
    Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Bookstein FL.
    Evol Dev; 2005 Jun; 7(3):244-58. PubMed ID: 15876197
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Ontogenetic study of the skull in modern humans and the common chimpanzees: neotenic hypothesis reconsidered with a tridimensional Procrustes analysis.
    Penin X, Berge C, Baylac M.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2002 May; 118(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 11953945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Discrimination of extant Pan species and subspecies using the enamel-dentine junction morphology of lower molars.
    Skinner MM, Gunz P, Wood BA, Boesch C, Hublin JJ.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2009 Oct; 140(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 19382140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Ontogenetic allometry, heterochrony, and interspecific differences in the skull of African apes, using tridimensional Procrustes analysis.
    Berge C, Penin X.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Jun; 124(2):124-38. PubMed ID: 15160366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Allometric and metameric shape variation in Pan mandibular molars: a digital morphometric analysis.
    Singleton M, Rosenberger AL, Robinson C, O'neill R.
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2011 Feb; 294(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 21235007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Regional dissociated heterochrony in multivariate analysis.
    Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Weber GW, Bookstein FL.
    Ann Anat; 2004 Dec; 186(5-6):463-70. PubMed ID: 15646279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans.
    Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Bernhard M, Schaefer K, Bookstein FL.
    J Hum Evol; 2004 Jun; 46(6):679-97. PubMed ID: 15183670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Permanent tooth mineralization in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (P. troglodytes).
    Boughner JC, Dean MC, Wilgenbusch CS.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2012 Dec; 149(4):560-71. PubMed ID: 23097136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Endocranial shape changes during growth in chimpanzees and humans: a morphometric analysis of unique and shared aspects.
    Neubauer S, Gunz P, Hublin JJ.
    J Hum Evol; 2010 Nov; 59(5):555-66. PubMed ID: 20727571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Geometric morphometric analysis of mandibular shape diversity in Pan.
    Robinson C.
    J Hum Evol; 2012 Jul; 63(1):191-204. PubMed ID: 22682959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Endocranial shape asymmetries in Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes and Gorilla gorilla assessed via skull based landmark analysis.
    Balzeau A, Gilissen E.
    J Hum Evol; 2010 Jul; 59(1):54-69. PubMed ID: 20537369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Bonobos have a more human-like second-to-fourth finger length ratio (2D:4D) than chimpanzees: a hypothesized indication of lower prenatal androgens.
    McIntyre MH, Herrmann E, Wobber V, Halbwax M, Mohamba C, de Sousa N, Atencia R, Cox D, Hare B.
    J Hum Evol; 2009 Apr; 56(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 19285708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. How many landmarks? Assessing the classification accuracy of Pan lower molars using a geometric morphometric analysis of the occlusal basin as seen at the enamel-dentine junction.
    Skinner MM, Gunz P, Wood BA, Hublin JJ.
    Front Oral Biol; 2009 Apr; 13():23-29. PubMed ID: 19828964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Are bonobos (Pan paniscus) really more bipedal than chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)?
    Videan EN, McGrew WC.
    Am J Primatol; 2001 Aug; 54(4):233-9. PubMed ID: 11468753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Segmental morphometrics of bonobos (Pan paniscus): are they really different from chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)?
    Druelle F, Schoonaert K, Aerts P, Nauwelaerts S, Stevens JMG, D'Août K.
    J Anat; 2018 Dec; 233(6):843-853. PubMed ID: 30294787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Social play in bonobos (Pan paniscus) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Implications for natural social systems and interindividual relationships.
    Palagi E.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006 Mar; 129(3):418-26. PubMed ID: 16323189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Does space in the jaw influence the timing of molar crown initiation? A model using baboons (Papio anubis) and great apes (Pan troglodytes, Pan paniscus).
    Boughner JC, Dean MC.
    J Hum Evol; 2004 Mar; 46(3):255-77. PubMed ID: 14984783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of the endocranial ontogenies between chimpanzees and bonobos via temporal regression and spatiotemporal registration.
    Durrleman S, Pennec X, Trouvé A, Ayache N, Braga J.
    J Hum Evol; 2012 Jan; 62(1):74-88. PubMed ID: 22137587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Ontogenetic study of allometric variation in Homo and Pan mandibles.
    Singh N.
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2014 Feb; 297(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 24347386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.