These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
106 related items for PubMed ID: 1729963
21. [In vitro thermosensitivity of various human tumors evaluated using the SDI (succinate dehydrogenase inhibition) test]. Fukuchi K, Miyamoto K. Rinsho Byori; 1990 Aug; 38(8):957-9. PubMed ID: 2232261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Chemosensitivity test with endoscopic biopsy specimens]. Wada K, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Yamauchi M, Kaneshiro K, Kondo T. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1995 Apr; 22(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 7717720 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The predictability of clinical antitumor effects using two distinctive in vitro chemosensitivity tests: an analysis of true positive cases. Yamada Y, Kubota T, Asanuma F, Yamada T, Suzuki T, Ishibiki K, Kawamura E. Surg Today; 1993 Apr; 23(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 8467169 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Antitumor chemosensitivity differs between clinical sarcoma and adenocarcinoma tissues. Takeuchi H, Baba H, Inutsuka S, Takahashi I, Kusumoto H, Maehara Y, Sugimachi K. Anticancer Res; 1994 Apr; 14(1A):169-71. PubMed ID: 8166444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Studies on the in vivo and in vitro chemosensitivity tests using human tumor xenografts]. Yamada Y, Yamada T, Asanuma F, Suzuki T, Kawamura E. Hum Cell; 1995 Dec; 8(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 8721088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The succinate dehydrogenase inhibition test for evaluating biopsy specimens and resected tumors of advanced gastric cancer. Kimura H, Yonemura Y, Ohyama S, Tsugawa K, Kinoshita K, Ninomiya I, Kosaka T, Miwa K, Miyazaki I, Tanaka M. Surg Today; 1992 Dec; 22(6):508-11. PubMed ID: 1472790 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Chemosensitivity and radiosensitivity of small cell lung cancer cell lines studied by a newly developed 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) hybrid assay. Hida T, Ueda R, Takahashi T, Watanabe H, Kato T, Suyama M, Sugiura T, Ariyoshi Y, Takahashi T. Cancer Res; 1989 Sep 01; 49(17):4785-90. PubMed ID: 2547517 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Chemosensitivity test for thyroid cancer by in vitro MTT assay]. Sasaki F, Ishimura H, Takada N, Uchino J. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1995 Oct 01; 22(12):1777-81. PubMed ID: 7574809 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Chemosensitivity testing of fresh human gastrointestinal cancers using AgNOR assay]. Gu P. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1993 Nov 01; 15(6):438-40. PubMed ID: 8200282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Study of in vitro cancer sensitivity of anticancer drugs by SDI (succinate dehydrogenase inhibition test)]. Kikuchi Y. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1994 Dec 01; 21(16):2757-62. PubMed ID: 7993111 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. High-sensitivity antitumor drug sensitivity testing. Kondo T, Wada K, Kawashima M, Sato Y, Yamauchi M. Oncology; 1994 Dec 01; 51(6):535-9. PubMed ID: 7970499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Human colon cancer tissues are more sensitive than rectal cancer tissues to antitumor drugs in vitro. Ueo H, Maehara Y, Saito A, Sakaguchi Y, Kohnoe S, Sugimachi K. Oncology; 1991 Dec 01; 48(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 1997940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Chemosensitivity differences between primary and metastatic lesions of clinical gastric cancer. Kusumoto H, Maehara Y, Kusumoto T, Anai H, Akazawa K, Sugimachi K. Eur J Surg Oncol; 1988 Dec 01; 14(6):685-9. PubMed ID: 3192005 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the subrenal capsule assay and succinate dehydrogenase inhibition test. Iwagaki H, Fuchimoto S, Orita K. J Med; 1989 Dec 01; 20(3-4):251-60. PubMed ID: 2809423 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [In vitro chemosensitivity testing evaluated by intracellular ATP level: ATP assay]. Maehara Y, Anai H, Masuda H, Miyamoto K, Fukuchi K, Tamada R, Sugimachi K. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1986 Jul 01; 13(7):2342-5. PubMed ID: 3729490 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The microtiter SDI test is more advantageous than the SDI test for assessing the chemosensitivity of human tumor cells. Kohnoe S, Emi Y, Sakaguchi Y, Maehara Y, Kusumoto T, Sugimachi K. Anticancer Drugs; 1991 Apr 01; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 1958859 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [SDI test using MTT for the evaluation of drug sensitivities of gastrointestinal cancer cells]. Idota C, Yamauchi M, Takagi H. Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi; 1990 Jan 20; 25(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 2324589 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Basic study on the sensitivity test for inhibiting fibroblast proliferation (II)]. Sato Y, Kondo T, Yamada F. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2001 Nov 20; 28(12):1885-90. PubMed ID: 11729481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [High clinical predictability of histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) for drug-sensitivity of cancer of the digestive organs]. Kubota T, Furukawa T, Kitajima M. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1993 Mar 20; 20(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 8452384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Multi-institutional feasibility study of SDI test for its application to the adjuvant chemotherapy of gastric cancer]. Yamauchi M, Kondo T. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1993 Mar 20; 20(4):432-9. PubMed ID: 8452380 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]