These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

366 related items for PubMed ID: 17302949

  • 1. Retention and leakage of implant-supported restorations luted with provisional cement: a pilot study.
    Pan YH, Ramp LC, Lin CK, Liu PR.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 34(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 17302949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration.
    Pan YH, Ramp LC, Lin CK, Liu PR.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006 Mar; 21(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 16955610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effect of thermal cycling and air abrasion on cement failure loads of 4 provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Michalakis K, Pissiotis AL, Kang K, Hirayama H, Garefis PD, Petridis H.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Mar; 22(4):569-74. PubMed ID: 17929517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y, Yamashita J, Shotwell JL, Chong KH, Wang HL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Emms M, Tredwin CJ, Setchell DJ, Moles DR.
    J Prosthodont; 2007 Jun; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS, Agar JR, Duncan JP, Taylor TD.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001 Jun; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
    Güncü MB, Cakan U, Canay S.
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of Luting Agents on Retention of Dental Implant-Supported Prostheses.
    Pan YH, Lin TM, Liu PR, Ramp LC.
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Oct; 41(5):596-9. PubMed ID: 24666355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system.
    Clayton GH, Driscoll CF, Hondrum SO.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997 Oct; 12(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 9337028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.