These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


384 related items for PubMed ID: 17309587

  • 1. Comparison of new and 3-month-old brush heads in the removal of plaque using a powered toothbrush.
    Hogan LM, Daly CG, Curtis BH.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Feb; 34(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 17309587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An investigation into the effect of three months' clinical wear on toothbrush efficacy: results from two independent studies.
    Conforti NJ, Cordero RE, Liebman J, Bowman JP, Putt MS, Kuebler DS, Davidson KR, Cugini M, Warren PR.
    J Clin Dent; 2003 Feb; 14(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 12723100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal.
    Biesbrock AR, Walters PA, Bartizek RD.
    J Clin Dent; 2002 Feb; 13(5):198-202. PubMed ID: 12518489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Approximal brush head used on a powered toothbrush.
    van der Weijden GA, Timmerman MF, Danser MM, Piscaer M, Ijzerman Y, van der Velden U.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Mar; 32(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 15766377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes.
    Haun J, Williams K, Friesen L, Ferrante A, Walters PA, Bartizek RD, Biesbrock AR.
    J Clin Dent; 2002 Mar; 13(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 12518488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of a battery-powered toothbrush. results from two independent studies.
    Dörfer CE, von Bethlenfalvy ER, Pioch T, Galustians HJ, Qaqish J, Sharma NC.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 11803988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.
    Cugini M, Thompson M, Warren PR.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov 01; 7(5):1-9. PubMed ID: 17091134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a commercially available manual toothbrush on the removal of established supragingival plaque: a single-use crossover study in adults.
    Singh S, Rustogi KN, Chaknis P, Petrone ME, DeVizio W, Proskin HM.
    J Clin Dent; 2005 Nov 01; 16(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 16170978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparative clinical study in plaque removal efficacy of a new sonic toothbrush (Float-Brush) with floating bristle action.
    Ojima M, Shizukuishi S, Matsuo T, Kanesaki N, Hanioka T.
    J Clin Dent; 2003 Nov 01; 14(2):42-4. PubMed ID: 12723103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.
    Warren P, Thompson M, Cugini M.
    J Clin Dent; 2007 Nov 01; 18(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 17508624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of plaque removal efficacy of new and 3-month-old toothbrushes in children.
    Malekafzali B, Biria M, Tadayon N, Abbasi H.
    East Mediterr Health J; 2011 Feb 01; 17(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 21735945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Brush head wear, subject-perceived and laboratory cleaning performance of two oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush heads over 3 months.
    Kaiser E, Thurnay S, Markgraf D, Pack S, Grender J, Hengehold D, Warren PR, Wehrbein H, Erbe C.
    Am J Dent; 2012 Apr 01; 25(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 22779281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dental plaque removal effectiveness of two powered toothbrushes.
    Bartizek RD, Biesbrock AR.
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jan 01; 17 Spec No():8A-12A. PubMed ID: 14998048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of an oscillating/rotating battery-powered toothbrush and a standard manual toothbrush.
    Dörfer CE, von Bethlenfalvy ER, Staehle HJ, Pioch T.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Nov 01; 14 Spec No():25B-28B. PubMed ID: 12003484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The impact of bristle profile on plaque removal efficacy of a battery-powered toothbrush.
    Biesbrock AR, Bartizek RD.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Jun 01; 16(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 12967068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A study comparing the plaque removal efficacy of an advanced rotation-oscillation power toothbrush to a new sonic toothbrush.
    Williams K, Rapley K, Huan J, Walters P, He T, Grender J, Biesbrock AR.
    J Clin Dent; 2008 Jun 01; 19(4):154-8. PubMed ID: 19278087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the effects of a sonic toothbrush with ultrasound waveguide in disrupting plaque with and without bristle contact.
    Biesbrock AR, He T, Walters PA, Bartizek RD.
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr 01; 21(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 18578173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A clinical investigation into the effect of toothbrush wear on efficacy.
    Warren PR, Jacobs D, Low MA, Chater BV, King DW.
    J Clin Dent; 2002 Apr 01; 13(3):119-24. PubMed ID: 11887515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Plaque removal efficacy of a prototype power toothbrush compared to a positive control manual toothbrush.
    Williams K, Haun J, Dockter K, Ferrante A, Bartizek RD, Biesbrock AR.
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug 01; 16(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 14579873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.