These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

310 related items for PubMed ID: 17309869

  • 1. Analysis of a case of internal contamination with cobalt radioisotopes.
    Vrba T, Malatova I, Jurochova B.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):527-30. PubMed ID: 17309869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The quantification of uncertainties in internal doses assessed from monitoring measurements.
    Etherington G.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):544-7. PubMed ID: 17237184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Application of voxel phantoms in whole-body counting for the validation of calibration phantoms and the assessment of uncertainties.
    de Carlan L, Roch P, Blanchardon E, Franck D.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):477-82. PubMed ID: 17018545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. IDEAS internal contamination database: a compilation of published internal contamination cases. A tool for the internal dosimetry community.
    Hurtgen C, Andrasi A, Bailey M, Blanchardon E, Berkovski V, Castellani CM, Doerfel H, Jourdain JR, LeGuen B, Malatova I, Marsh J, Puncher M.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):520-2. PubMed ID: 17012307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Automatic application of ICRP biokinetic models in voxel phantoms for in vivo counting and internal dose assessment.
    Lamart S, de Carlan L, Blanchardon E, Franck D.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):240-4. PubMed ID: 17623683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Twenty-year follow-up of a Pu/Am inhalation case.
    Wernli C, Eikenberg J.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):506-12. PubMed ID: 17298952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The computation of ICRP dose coefficients for intakes of radionuclides with PLEIADES: biokinetic aspects.
    Fell TP.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):220-2. PubMed ID: 17921508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Worldwide bioassay data resources for plutonium/americium internal dosimetry studies.
    Miller G, Riddell AE, Filipy R, Bertelli L, Little T, Guilmette R.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):531-7. PubMed ID: 17337740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A step-by-step procedure to aid the assessment of intake and doses from measurement data.
    Marsh JW, Bailey MR, Birchall A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(4):491-508. PubMed ID: 15914512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnosis of internal radionuclide contamination by mobile laboratories.
    Castagnet X, Amabile JC, Cazoulat A, Lecompte Y, de Carbonnières H, Laroche P.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):469-71. PubMed ID: 17309874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Analysis of the uncertainty in internal dose estimate resulting from biological stochastic variability of excretion.
    Molokanov A, Blanchardon E.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):561-4. PubMed ID: 17848381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Biokinetic models for the behaviour of carbon-14 from labelled compounds in the human body: can a single generic model be justified?
    Taylor DM.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 108(3):187-202. PubMed ID: 15031441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. MDA improvement technique for lung counter measurements of uranium workers.
    Pelled O, German U, Pollak G, Tshuva A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):496-9. PubMed ID: 17355982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Estimation of the uncertainty in internal dose calculation for two contamination cases.
    Blanchardon E, Molokanov A, Franck D, Kochetkov O, Panfilov A, Jourdain JR.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):548-52. PubMed ID: 17237182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of dose estimation from occupational exposure to 239Pu using different modelling approaches.
    Romanov SA, Guilmette RA, Khokhryakov VF, Phipps A, Aladova EE, Bertelli L, Birchall A, Eckerman KF, Khokhryakov VV, Krahenbuhl MP, Leggett RW, Little TT, Miller G, Miller SC, Riddell A, Suslova KG, Vostrotin VV, Zaytseva YV.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):486-90. PubMed ID: 18045798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Assessment of occupational exposure to uranium by indirect methods needs information on natural background variations.
    Muikku M, Heikkinen T, Puhakainen M, Rahola T, Salonen L.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):492-5. PubMed ID: 17309870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. IMBA Professional Plus: a flexible approach to internal dosimetry.
    Birchall A, Puncher M, Marsh JW, Davis K, Bailey MR, Jarvis NS, Peach AD, Dorrian MD, James AC.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):194-7. PubMed ID: 17132655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of committed effective doses from internal contamination of 241Am using experimentally determined parameters of the contaminant.
    Malátová I, Becková V, Vrba T.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 127(1-4):521-5. PubMed ID: 17951238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Uncertainties in doses calculated according to ICRP recommendations after inhalation of 239PUO2 and early chest monitoring.
    Fritsch P.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 125(1-4):553-6. PubMed ID: 17223643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.