These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

327 related items for PubMed ID: 1732937

  • 1. Mammographic analysis of calcifications.
    Bassett LW.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 1732937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Growth Dynamics of Mammographic Calcifications: Differentiating Ductal Carcinoma in Situ from Benign Breast Disease.
    Grimm LJ, Miller MM, Thomas SM, Liu Y, Lo JY, Hwang ES, Hyslop T, Ryser MD.
    Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31112087
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
    Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P, Del Frate C, Soldano F, Isola M, Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Simonetti G, Lattanzio V, Del Maschio A.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. High-grade histologic features of DCIS are associated with R5 rather than R3 calcifications in breast screening mammography.
    Hayes BD, Brodie C, O'Doherty A, Quinn CM.
    Breast J; 2013 Jun; 19(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 23600490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Consensus review: A method of assessment of calcifications that appropriately undergo a six-month follow-up.
    Kuzmiak CM, Dancel R, Pisano E, Zeng D, Cole E, Koomen MA, McLelland R.
    Acad Radiol; 2006 May; 13(5):621-9. PubMed ID: 16627203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Our surgical indication for breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer--special reference to extensive intraductal component and mammographic calcifications].
    Takashima S, Doihara H, Saeki T, Mandai K, Kataoka M.
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1994 Jun; 21 Suppl 2():190-6. PubMed ID: 8037481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Detection of microcalcifications in breast specimens by 4-fold DIMA direct magnification radiography compared to 1.5-fold conventional magnification radiography].
    Grunert JH, Borchert B, Farber A, Gmelin E.
    Rofo; 1999 Oct; 171(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 10598166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Computer-aided detection of amorphous calcifications.
    Soo MS, Rosen EL, Xia JQ, Ghate S, Baker JA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Mar; 184(3):887-92. PubMed ID: 15728613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Patterns of mammographically detected calcifications after breast-conserving therapy associated with tumor recurrence.
    Dershaw DD, Giess CS, McCormick B, Borgen P, Liberman L, Abramson AF, Morris E.
    Cancer; 1997 Apr 01; 79(7):1355-61. PubMed ID: 9083158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Differentiation of ductal carcinoma in-situ from benign micro-calcifications by dedicated breast computed tomography.
    Aminololama-Shakeri S, Abbey CK, Gazi P, Prionas ND, Nosratieh A, Li CS, Boone JM, Lindfors KK.
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan 01; 85(1):297-303. PubMed ID: 26520874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening.
    Hofvind S, Iversen BF, Eriksen L, Styr BM, Kjellevold K, Kurz KD.
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Jun 01; 52(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 21498306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Mammographic and histologic correlations of microcalcifications.
    de Paredes ES, Abbitt PL, Tabbarah S, Bickers MA, Smith DC.
    Radiographics; 1990 Jul 01; 10(4):577-89. PubMed ID: 2377764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Breast calcifications].
    Villeirs G, Mortier M, De Potter C, Kunnen M.
    J Belge Radiol; 1995 Feb 01; 78(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 7890588
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
    Holland R, Hendriks JH.
    Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug 01; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Classification of ductal carcinoma in situ by image analysis of calcifications from digital mammograms.
    Parker J, Dance DR, Davies DH, Yeoman LJ, Michell MJ, Humphreys S.
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Feb 01; 68(806):150-9. PubMed ID: 7735745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions].
    Pastore G, Marano P, Romani M, Costantini M, Belli P.
    Radiol Med; 1999 May 01; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) present on previous mammography.
    Evans AJ, Wilson AR, Burrell HC, Ellis IO, Pinder SE.
    Clin Radiol; 1999 Oct 01; 54(10):644-6. PubMed ID: 10541387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Lesion size is a major determinant of the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: findings from the Sloane project.
    Evans A, Clements K, Maxwell A, Bishop H, Hanby A, Lawrence G, Pinder SE, Sloane Project Steering Group.
    Clin Radiol; 2010 Mar 01; 65(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 20152272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.