These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

120 related items for PubMed ID: 1733476

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.
    Prokop M, Galanski M, Oestmann JW, von Falkenhausen U, Rosenthal H, Reimer P, Nischelsky J, Reichelt S.
    Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Mosser H, Pärtan G, Urban M, Krampla W, Ottes F, Hruby W.
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [The value of digital imaging techniques in skeletal imaging].
    Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Sommer A, Georgi M.
    Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 1849297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Lung imaging in intensive medicine. A comparison of digital storage-screen imaging and conventional film-screen imaging].
    Busch HP, Winter-Nossek A, Bethke U, Kohler P, Georgi M.
    Rofo; 1990 Apr; 152(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 2160100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A ROC study of AMBER and conventional chest imaging in the detection of simulated interstitial lung disease.
    van Schelven IH, Winter LH, Chakraborty DP, Schultze Kool LJ.
    Eur J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 21(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 8654463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [A comparison of digital luminescence radiography and the conventional film-screen technic in pulmonary coin lesions--a clinical study].
    Schwermer B, Witte G, Spielmann RP, Nicolas V, Fassbender T.
    Rofo; 1990 Aug; 153(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 2168071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Digital luminescence and conventional radiography in laryngeal and pharyngeal diagnosis].
    Malms J, Bier H.
    Radiologe; 1991 Aug; 31(8):388-93. PubMed ID: 1947054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
    Ekestubbe A, Gröndahl HG, Molander B.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.