These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

119 related items for PubMed ID: 1733879

  • 1. Quality of urography and renal clearance of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Thomsen HS, Vestergaard A, Dorph S.
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Jan; 27(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 1733879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Urography and renal clearance of contrast media. A randomized comparison of an ionic high-osmolar and a non-ionic low-osmolar contrast medium].
    Vestergaard AS, Thomsen HS.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Jan 15; 152(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 2405555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Renal clearance of an ionic high-osmolar and a nonionic low-osmolar contrast medium.
    Thomsen HS, Vestergaard A, Nielsen SL, Fogh-Andersen N, Golman K, Dorph S.
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jun 15; 26(6):564-8. PubMed ID: 1860763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of contrast media osmolality on intravenous urographic quality.
    Lovett I, Benn I, Benness G, Doust B.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Jun 15; 128():105-7. PubMed ID: 2568775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pharmacokinetics of iohexol, iopamidol, iopromide, and iosimide compared with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Hartwig P, Mützel W, Taenzer V.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Jun 15; 128():220-3. PubMed ID: 2568800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. New and old contrast agents: pharmacology, tissue opacification, and excretory urography.
    Spataro RF.
    Urol Radiol; 1988 Jun 15; 10(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 3043872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Iopamidol: new, nonionic contrast agent for excretory urography.
    Thompson WM, Foster WL, Halvorsen RA, Dunnick NR, Rommel AJ, Bates M.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Feb 15; 142(2):329-32. PubMed ID: 6607602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
    Gavant ML, Ellis JV, Klesges LM.
    Radiology; 1992 Mar 15; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Tubular nephrotoxicity after intravenous urography with ionic high-osmolal and nonionic low-osmolal contrast media in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.
    Cavaliere G, Arrigo G, D'Amico G, Bernasconi P, Schiavina G, Dellafiore L, Vergnaghi D.
    Nephron; 1987 Mar 15; 46(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 2885767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative effects of nonionic (iopamidol) and ionic (sodium and meglumine diatrizoate) contrast media for urography on urinary excretion of water and solutes.
    Garibotto G, Saffioti S, Garlaschi G, Gambaro A, Satragno L, Cittadini G.
    Urol Radiol; 1986 Mar 15; 8(4):199-203. PubMed ID: 3798605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Nephrotoxicity of nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast media: a prospective double-blind randomized comparison in human beings.
    Katholi RE, Taylor GJ, Woods WT, Womack KA, Katholi CR, McCann WP, Moses HW, Dove JT, Mikell FL, Woodruff RC.
    Radiology; 1993 Jan 15; 186(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 8416561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Iopamidol in urography. A comparison between ionic and nonionic contrast media in patients with normal and impaired renal function.
    Dalla Palma L, Rossi M, Stacul F, Agostini R.
    Urol Radiol; 1982 Jan 15; 4(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 7101596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Experimental urography in dogs: diagnostic quality and pharmacokinetic behavior of iotrolan in comparison to nonionic and ionic, monomeric contrast media.
    Nauert C, Mützel W.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989 Jan 15; 128():82-7. PubMed ID: 2568814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. One or two samples for determination of total plasma clearance of a nonionic contrast medium in patients undergoing enhanced CT.
    Thomsen HS, Vestergaard A, Golman K, Dorph S.
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Nov 15; 33(6):588-91. PubMed ID: 1449886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Plasma osmolality, iodine concentration and urographic images following high and low osmolar contrast media.
    Todd AW, Naisby GP, Owen JP, Smith PA, Butler TJ, Kelly PJ, Murthy LN, Robson JY, Laker MF.
    Clin Radiol; 1991 May 15; 43(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 2036759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Comparison between ionic and non ionic contrast media in fast injection nephro-urography (author's transl)].
    Dalla Palma L, Rossi M, Stacul F, Agostini R.
    Radiol Med; 1981 May 15; 67(1-2):55-60. PubMed ID: 7268075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. High- and low-osmolar contrast agents in urography: a comparison of the appearances with respect to pyelotubular opacification and renal length.
    Whitehouse RW.
    Clin Radiol; 1986 Jul 15; 37(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 3731706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Advantages of nonionic contrast agents in adult urography.
    Dray RJ, Winfield AC, Muhletaler CA, Kirchner FK.
    Urology; 1984 Sep 15; 24(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 6382739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Maximizing opacification during excretory urography: effect of low-osmolarity contrast media.
    Gavant ML, Ellis JV, Klesges LM.
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1992 Apr 15; 43(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 1373337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Does dilution of contrast media affect contrast enhancement? An experimental study in rats.
    Dean PB, Kivisaari L, Kormano M.
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Sep 15; 23 Suppl 1():S118-21. PubMed ID: 3198330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.