These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
255 related items for PubMed ID: 17341898
1. Analysis of complications after reconstruction of bone defects involving complete mandibular resection using finite element modelling. Markwardt J, Pfeifer G, Eckelt U, Reitemeier B. Onkologie; 2007 Mar; 30(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 17341898 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mandibular reconstruction using a titanium plate: the impact of radiation therapy on plate preservation. Ryu JK, Stern RL, Robinson MG, Bowers MK, Kubo HD, Donald PJ, Rosenthal SA, Fu KK. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jun 15; 32(3):627-34. PubMed ID: 7790248 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Plate related complication after mandibular reconstruction]. Liu SP, Cai ZG, Zhang J, Zhang JG, Zhang Y. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Oct 15; 48(10):586-90. PubMed ID: 24438564 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The biomechanical aspects of reconstruction for segmental defects of the mandible: a finite element study to assess the optimisation of plate and screw factors. Bujtár P, Simonovics J, Váradi K, Sándor GK, Avery CM. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep 15; 42(6):855-62. PubMed ID: 24467871 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Long-term complications associated with immediate plate reconstruction for mandibular defect following tumor-surgery]. Zhang Y, Zhang J, Yu G. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jul 15; 34(4):205-7. PubMed ID: 11776905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary mandibular reconstruction: analysis of 64 cases and evaluation of interface radiation dosimetry on bridging plates. Gullane PJ. Laryngoscope; 1991 Jun 15; 101(6 Pt 2 Suppl 54):1-24. PubMed ID: 2041453 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Stress tests of reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects]. Knoll WD, Gaida A, Maurer P. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2004 Jul 15; 8(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 15293119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Local and systemic risk factors influencing the long-term success of angular stable alloplastic reconstruction plates of the mandible. Kämmerer PW, Klein MO, Moergel M, Gemmel M, Draenert GF. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul 15; 42(5):e271-6. PubMed ID: 24296118 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandibular reconstruction with the titanium hollow screw reconstruction plate (THORP) system: evaluation of 62 cases. Vuillemin T, Raveh J, Sutter F. Plast Reconstr Surg; 1988 Nov 15; 82(5):804-14. PubMed ID: 3174870 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal design of an individual endoprosthesis for the reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects with finite element analysis. Li P, Shen L, Li J, Liang R, Tian W, Tang W. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan 15; 42(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 23541861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of plate use for mandibular reconstruction: has changing technology made a difference? Klotch DW, Gal TJ, Gal RL. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Oct 15; 121(4):388-92. PubMed ID: 10504593 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Immediate reconstruction of mandibular defects following tumor surgery with Ti-plate system]. Zhang Y. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1994 Jan 15; 29(1):3-5, 62. PubMed ID: 7995131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Functional dynamic bridging plate and its use in the mandible]. Krenkel C, Roth SA. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1994 Jan 15; 39():177-80. PubMed ID: 8088657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical problems and complications in the removal of the less invasive stabilization system. Suzuki T, Smith WR, Stahel PF, Morgan SJ, Baron AJ, Hak DJ. J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jun 15; 24(6):369-73. PubMed ID: 20502220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Volume-length impact of lateral jaw resections on complication rates. Arden RL, Rachel JD, Marks SC, Dang K. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Jan 15; 125(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 9932591 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Results of the use of titanium mandibular reconstruction plates]. Coustal B, Michelet V, Pinsolle J, Siberchicot F, Caix P, Michelet FX. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1994 Jan 15; 95(4):274-7. PubMed ID: 7939356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive factors for premature loss of Martin 2.7 mandibular reconstruction plates. van der Rijt EE, Noorlag R, Koole R, Abbink JH, Rosenberg AJ. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Feb 15; 53(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 25468318 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy of small reconstruction plates in vascularized bone graft mandibular reconstruction. Farwell DG, Kezirian EJ, Heydt JL, Yueh B, Futran ND. Head Neck; 2006 Jul 15; 28(7):573-9. PubMed ID: 16755584 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of mechanical stress in reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects. Knoll WD, Gaida A, Maurer P. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun 15; 34(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 16644232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]