These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
11. Progress towards patient-specific computational flow modeling of the left heart via combination of magnetic resonance imaging with computational fluid dynamics. Saber NR, Wood NB, Gosman AD, Merrifield RD, Yang GZ, Charrier CL, Gatehouse PD, Firmin DN. Ann Biomed Eng; 2003 Jan; 31(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 12572655 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Subject-specific computational simulation of left ventricular flow based on magnetic resonance imaging. Long Q, Merrifield R, Xu XY, Kilner P, Firmin DN, G-Z Y. Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 May; 222(4):475-85. PubMed ID: 18595359 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of systolic and diastolic arterial wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Efstathopoulos EP, Patatoukas G, Pantos I, Benekos O, Katritsis D, Kelekis NL. Phys Med; 2008 Dec; 24(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 18343178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of the coupling of magnetic resonance imaging velocity measurements with computational fluid dynamics in a U bend. Glor FP, Westenberg JJ, Vierendeels J, Danilouchkine M, Verdonck P. Artif Organs; 2002 Jul; 26(7):622-35. PubMed ID: 12081521 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Flow-induced disturbances in balanced steady-state free precession images: means to reduce or exploit them. Lagerstrand KM, Plewes DB, Vikhoff-Baaz B, Forssell-Aronsson E. Magn Reson Med; 2009 Apr; 61(4):893-8. PubMed ID: 19191282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of Numerical Simulations of Thoracic Aorta Hemodynamics: Comparison with In Vivo Measurements and Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis. Boccadifuoco A, Mariotti A, Capellini K, Celi S, Salvetti MV. Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):688-706. PubMed ID: 30357714 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]