These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Pooling samples: the key to sensitive, specific and cost-effective genetic diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in low-resource countries. Shipitsyna E, Shalepo K, Savicheva A, Unemo M, Domeika M. Acta Derm Venereol; 2007; 87(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 17340020 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Ligase chain reaction testing of pooled urine specimens to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infection]. Sánchez-Alemán MA, Gutiérrez JP, Bertozzi SM, Frontela-Noda M, Guerrero-Lemus V, Conde-González CJ. Rev Invest Clin; 2005; 57(4):548-54. PubMed ID: 16315639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of pooled urine samples and automated DNA isolation to achieve improved sensitivity and cost-effectiveness of large-scale testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women. Rours GI, Verkooyen RP, Willemse HF, van der Zwaan EA, van Belkum A, de Groot R, Verbrugh HA, Ossewaarde JM. J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 43(9):4684-90. PubMed ID: 16145127 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A Swedish cost-effectiveness analysis of community-based Chlamydia trachomatis PCR testing of postal urine specimens obtained at home. Novak DP, Lindholm L, Jonsson M, Karlsson RB. Scand J Public Health; 2004 Sep; 32(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 15513664 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening adolescent males for Chlamydia on admission to detention. Blake DR, Gaydos CA, Quinn TC. Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Feb; 31(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 14743071 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity evaluation of the Gen-Probe AMP-CT assay by pooling urine samples for the screening of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infection. Gomes JP, Viegas S, Paulino A, Catry MA. Int J STD AIDS; 2002 Aug; 13(8):540-2. PubMed ID: 12194735 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital infections among the male and female population of the Republic of Macedonia. Spasovski MS, Simjanovska LJ, Taleski V, Petrova N, Lazetic L, Popeska Z, Gaydos CA, Quinn TC, Efremov GD. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Jul; 19(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 15987287 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK. Norman JE, Wu O, Twaddle S, Macmillan S, McMillan L, Templeton A, McKenzie H, Noone A, Allardice G, Reid M. BJOG; 2004 Nov; 111(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 15521872 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Urine samples for screening of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in young male recruits]. Jensen IP. Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 May 03; 155(18):1376-8. PubMed ID: 8497970 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Pooling urine samples for ligase chain reaction screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women. Kacena KA, Quinn SB, Howell MR, Madico GE, Quinn TC, Gaydos CA. J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Feb 03; 36(2):481-5. PubMed ID: 9466763 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy; cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more]. Postma MJ, Bakker A, Welte R, van Bergen JE, van den Hoek JA, de Jong-van den Berg LT, Jager JC. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Dec 02; 144(49):2350-4. PubMed ID: 11129971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating adolescents in juvenile detention facilities for urogenital chlamydial infection: costs and effectiveness of alternative interventions. Mrus JM, Biro FM, Huang B, Tsevat J. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2003 Jul 02; 157(7):696-702. PubMed ID: 12860793 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel gel-based method for self-collection and ambient temperature postal transport of urine for PCR detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Bialasiewicz S, Whiley DM, Buhrer-Skinner M, Bautista C, Barker K, Aitken S, Gordon R, Muller R, Lambert SB, Debattista J, Nissen MD, Sloots TP. Sex Transm Infect; 2009 Apr 02; 85(2):102-5. PubMed ID: 19004866 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence and persistence of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in urine specimens from Danish male military recruits. van den Brule AJ, Munk C, Winther JF, Kjaer SK, Jørgensen HO, Meijer CJ, Morré SA. Int J STD AIDS; 2002 Dec 02; 13 Suppl 2():19-22. PubMed ID: 12537720 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A new automated method for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from urine eliminates inhibition and increases robustness for NAAT systems. Anglès d'Auriac M, Refseth UH, Espelund M, Moi H, Størvold G, Jeansson S. J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Sep 02; 70(3):416-23. PubMed ID: 17610971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The C-project: use of self-collection kits to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis in young people in a community-based health promotion project. Martin L, Freedman E, Burton L, Rutter S, Knight V, D'Amato A, Murray C, Drysdale J, Harvey S, McNulty A. Sex Health; 2009 Jun 02; 6(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 19457296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Chlamydia trachomatis: should it be systematically be screened or treated? Literature review and cost/benefit estimation in France]. Henry-Suchet J, Sluzhinska A, Serfaty D. Contracept Fertil Sex; 1998 Feb 02; 26(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 9560916 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]