These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

174 related items for PubMed ID: 17366762

  • 1. Caries preventive effect of occlusal sealant extension to ART restorations compared with non-extended amalgam restorations.
    Frencken JE, van 't Hof MA, Taifour D.
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2007; 5(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17366762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years.
    Chen X, Du MQ, Fan MW, Mulder J, Huysmans MC, Frencken JE.
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):554-60. PubMed ID: 22300651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.
    Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, Taifour D, Al-Zaher I.
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 35(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 17518967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years.
    Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD.
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 26(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 9870536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Glass ionomer ART sealants in Chinese school children-6-year results.
    Holmgren CJ, Lo EC, Hu D.
    J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):764-70. PubMed ID: 23831419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years.
    Beiruti N, Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, Taifour D, van Palenstein Helderman WH.
    Caries Res; 2006 Sep; 40(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16352882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Six-year success rates of occlusal amalgam and glass-ionomer restorations placed using three minimal intervention approaches.
    Mandari GJ, Frencken JE, van't Hof MA.
    Caries Res; 2003 Sep; 37(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 12771499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment restorations and sealants under field conditions.
    Motsei SM, Kroon J, Holtshousen WS.
    SADJ; 2001 Jul; 56(7):309-15. PubMed ID: 11575114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention approaches for managing dental caries: survival of restorations after 2 years.
    Mandari GJ, Truin GJ, van't Hof MA, Frencken JE.
    Caries Res; 2001 Jul; 35(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 11275667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Three-year survival of one-surface ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe.
    Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD, Hackenitz E.
    Caries Res; 1998 Jul; 32(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 9544860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: six-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Smith CD, Williams JE, Sherrer JD, Mackert JR, Richards EE, Schuster GS, O'Dell NL, Pierce KL, Kovarik RE.
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Dec; 23(12):827-38. PubMed ID: 1305301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The sealant restoration: indications, success and clinical technique.
    Hassall DC, Mellor AC.
    Br Dent J; 2001 Oct 13; 191(7):358-62. PubMed ID: 11697597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Glass ionomer cements used as fissure sealants with the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: review of literature.
    Yip HK, Smales RJ.
    Int Dent J; 2002 Apr 13; 52(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 12013252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Sealants: where we have been; where we are going.
    Donly KJ.
    Gen Dent; 2002 Apr 13; 50(5):438-40. PubMed ID: 12448896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effectiveness of fissure sealants on initial caries lesions (ICDAS 1-3) of permanent molars: A 4-year follow-up.
    Berdouses ED, Michalaki M, Tsinidou K, Vlachou A, Pantazis N, Oulis CJ.
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2021 Sep 13; 22(3):180-188. PubMed ID: 34544245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Sealing occlusal caries lesions in adults referred for restorative treatment: 2-3 years of follow-up.
    Bakhshandeh A, Qvist V, Ekstrand KR.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Apr 13; 16(2):521-9. PubMed ID: 21479565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Occlusal caries formation in vitro: comparison of resin-modified glass ionomer with fluoride-releasing sealant.
    Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000 Apr 13; 24(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 11314417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W, Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip KH.
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan 13; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth.
    Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Walsh T, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M, Worthington HV.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Mar 28; (3):CD001830. PubMed ID: 23543512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.