These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

586 related items for PubMed ID: 17371794

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Effect of polymorphisms in candidate genes on reproduction traits in Finnish pig populations.
    Sironen AI, Uimari P, Serenius T, Mote B, Rothschild M, Vilkki J.
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Mar; 88(3):821-7. PubMed ID: 19933427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Survival analysis in two lines of rabbits selected for reproductive traits.
    Piles M, Garreau H, Rafel O, Larzul C, Ramon J, Ducrocq V.
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Jul; 84(7):1658-65. PubMed ID: 16775049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Effect of population size of performance test on short-term selection result of sire line].
    Zhang H, Li JQ, Wang C, Liu XH, Chen YS.
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Jul; 32(7):696-703. PubMed ID: 16078737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Responses in ovulation rate, embryonal survival, and litter traits in swine to 14 generations of selection to increase litter size.
    Johnson RK, Nielsen MK, Casey DS.
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Mar; 77(3):541-57. PubMed ID: 10229349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Genetic parameter estimates among scale activity score and farrowing disposition with reproductive traits in swine.
    Schneider JF, Rempel LA, Rohrer GA, Brown-Brandl TM.
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Nov; 89(11):3514-21. PubMed ID: 21705635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Components of litter size in mice after 110 generations of selection.
    Holt M, Vangen O, Farstad W.
    Reproduction; 2004 May; 127(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 15129014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Age, body weight and backfat thickness at first observed oestrus in crossbred Landrace x Yorkshire gilts, seasonal variations and their influence on subsequence reproductive performance.
    Tummaruk P, Tantasuparuk W, Techakumphu M, Kunavongkrit A.
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2007 May; 99(1-2):167-81. PubMed ID: 16765000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Analysis of 28 generations of selection for reproduction, growth, and carcass traits in swine.
    Hsu WL, Johnson RK.
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Nov; 92(11):4806-22. PubMed ID: 25349336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Genetic selection for ovulation rate and litter size in rabbits: Estimation of genetic parameters and direct and correlated responses.
    Ziadi C, Mocé ML, Laborda P, Blasco A, Santacreu MA.
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3113-20. PubMed ID: 23658345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the Nebraska Index line. I. Reproductive responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB, Johnson RK.
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1000-6. PubMed ID: 15080320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits.
    Gilbert H, Bidanel JP, Gruand J, Caritez JC, Billon Y, Guillouet P, Lagant H, Noblet J, Sellier P.
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3182-8. PubMed ID: 17785600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Results from nine generations of selection for increased litter size in swine.
    Holl JW, Robison OW.
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Mar; 81(3):624-9. PubMed ID: 12661642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Variance components and heritabilities for sow productivity traits estimated from purebred versus crossbred sows.
    Ehlers MJ, Mabry JW, Bertrand JK, Stalder KJ.
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Oct; 122(5):318-24. PubMed ID: 16191040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Influence of early postweaning traits on genetic improvement of meat productivity in purebred Berkshire pigs.
    Tomiyama M, Oikawa T, Hoque MA, Kanetani T, Mori H.
    J Anim Sci; 2009 May; 87(5):1613-9. PubMed ID: 19181764
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: body condition, skin lesions, and performance.
    Salak-Johnson JL, Niekamp SR, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Ellis M, Curtis SE.
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1758-69. PubMed ID: 17371790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Genetic parameters for ewe productivity traits in the Columbia, Suffolk and Targhee breeds.
    Abdulkhaliq AM, Harvey WR, Parker CF.
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Dec; 67(12):3250-7. PubMed ID: 2613573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Impact of the ESR gene on litter size and production traits in Czech Large White pigs.
    Goliásová E, Wolf J.
    Anim Genet; 2004 Aug; 35(4):293-7. PubMed ID: 15265068
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.