These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

537 related items for PubMed ID: 1737887

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Dynamic information in the identification and discrimination of vowels.
    Fox RA.
    Phonetica; 1989; 46(1-3):97-116. PubMed ID: 2608728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Identification of vowels spoken in isolation versus vowels spoken in consonantal context.
    Macchi MJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1636-42. PubMed ID: 7462462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Perception of silent-center syllables by native and non-native English speakers.
    Rogers CL, Lopez AS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1278-93. PubMed ID: 18681614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels.
    Strange W, Jenkins JJ, Johnson TL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Sep; 74(3):695-705. PubMed ID: 6630725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of consonantal context on perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners.
    Strange W, Akahane-Yamada R, Kubo R, Trent SA, Nishi K.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1691-704. PubMed ID: 11325137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception.
    Nearey TM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2088-113. PubMed ID: 2659638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Contextual variation in the acoustic and perceptual similarity of North German and American English vowels.
    Strange W, Bohn OS, Nishi K, Trent SA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1751-62. PubMed ID: 16240833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Vowel formant discrimination for high-fidelity speech.
    Liu C, Kewley-Port D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1224-33. PubMed ID: 15376687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: evidence for partial compensation.
    Beddor PS, Krakow RA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2868-87. PubMed ID: 10573902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Listener expectations and gender bias in nonsibilant fricative perception.
    Babel M, McGuire G.
    Phonetica; 2013 Nov; 70(1-2):117-51. PubMed ID: 24157437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Perception of the [m]-[n] distinction in VC syllables.
    Repp BH, Svastikula K.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jan; 83(1):237-47. PubMed ID: 3343443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.