These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

537 related items for PubMed ID: 1737887

  • 21. Perceptual invariance of coarticulated vowels over variations in speaking rate.
    Stack JW, Strange W, Jenkins JJ, Clarke WD, Trent SA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2394-405. PubMed ID: 16642852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Perceptual assimilation and L2 learning: evidence from the perception of Southern British English vowels by native speakers of Greek and Japanese.
    Lengeris A.
    Phonetica; 2009 Apr; 66(3):169-87. PubMed ID: 19776666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Perception of dynamic information for vowels in syllable onsets and offsets.
    Jenkins JJ, Strange W.
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1200-10. PubMed ID: 10497437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Order effect of acoustic segments of VC and CV syllables on stop and vowel identification.
    Ohde RN, Sharf DJ.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Sep; 20(3):543-54. PubMed ID: 904315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Perception of the [m]-[n] distinction in consonant-vowel (CV) and vowel-consonant (VC) syllables produced by child and adult talkers.
    Ohde RN, Haley KL, Barnes CW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1697-711. PubMed ID: 16583913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Shifting Perceptual Weights in L2 Vowel Identification after Training.
    Hu W, Mi L, Yang Z, Tao S, Li M, Wang W, Dong Q, Liu C.
    PLoS One; 2016 Mar; 11(9):e0162876. PubMed ID: 27649413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: phonetic context effects.
    Strange W, Weber A, Levy ES, Shafiro V, Hisagi M, Nishi K.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1111-29. PubMed ID: 17672658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Dynamic spectral structure specifies vowels for adults and children.
    Nittrouer S, Lowenstein JH.
    Lang Speech; 2014 Dec; 57(Pt 4):487-512. PubMed ID: 25536845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Vowel formant discrimination II: Effects of stimulus uncertainty, consonantal context, and training.
    Kewley-Port D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2141-55. PubMed ID: 11681391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Vowel identification by younger and older listeners: relative effectiveness of vowel edges and vowel centers.
    Donaldson GS, Talmage EK, Rogers CL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):EL105-10. PubMed ID: 20815425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The relative importance of spectral tilt in monophthongs and diphthongs.
    Kiefte M, Kluender KR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1395-404. PubMed ID: 15807027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Vowel identification by cochlear implant users: Contributions of duration cues and dynamic spectral cues.
    Donaldson GS, Rogers CL, Johnson LB, Oh SH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 26233007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. English vowel identification and vowel formant discrimination by native Mandarin Chinese- and native English-speaking listeners: The effect of vowel duration dependence.
    Mi L, Tao S, Wang W, Dong Q, Guan J, Liu C.
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():58-65. PubMed ID: 26768853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Integral perception, but separate processing: The perceptual normalization of lexical tones and vowels.
    Zhang K, Sjerps MJ, Peng G.
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jun 18; 156():107839. PubMed ID: 33798490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Neighboring spectral content influences vowel identification.
    Holt LL, Lotto AJ, Kluender KR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Aug 18; 108(2):710-22. PubMed ID: 10955638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Coarticulatory influences on the perceived height of nasal vowels.
    Krakow RA, Beddor PS, Goldstein LM, Fowler CA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar 18; 83(3):1146-58. PubMed ID: 3356819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effects of vocalic formant transitions and vowel quality on the English [s]-[ŝ] boundary.
    Whalen DH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Jan 18; 69(1):275-82. PubMed ID: 7217525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: Role of formant transitions.
    Assmann PF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug 18; 100(2 Pt 1):1141-52. PubMed ID: 8759967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Thresholds for formant-frequency discrimination of vowels in consonantal context.
    Kewley-Port D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 May 18; 97(5 Pt 1):3139-46. PubMed ID: 7759654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Perception of static and dynamic acoustic cues to place of articulation in initial stop consonants.
    Kewley-Port D, Pisoni DB, Studdert-Kennedy M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 May 18; 73(5):1779-93. PubMed ID: 6223060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.