These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

152 related items for PubMed ID: 17389740

  • 1. A comparison of global indices between the Medmont Automated Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Landers J, Sharma A, Goldberg I, Graham S.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 91(10):1285-7. PubMed ID: 17389740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of visual field sensitivities between the Medmont automated perimeter and the Humphrey field analyser.
    Landers J, Sharma A, Goldberg I, Graham SL.
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Apr; 38(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 20447123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from a Tablet Perimeter, Smart Visual Function Analyzer, and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Kang J, De Arrigunaga S, Freeman SE, Zhao Y, Lin M, Liebman DL, Roldan AM, Kim JA, Chang DS, Friedman DS, Elze T.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023 Apr; 6(5):509-520. PubMed ID: 36918066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of Visual Field Measurement with Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer in Patients with Ocular Hypertension.
    Kaczorowski K, Mulak M, Szumny D, Baranowska M, Jakubaszko-Jabłońska J, Misiuk-Hojło M.
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2016 Apr; 25(5):937-944. PubMed ID: 28028959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A multicenter comparison study of the Humphrey Field Analyzer I and the Humphrey Field Analyzer II.
    Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Drance SM, Gaasterland D, Mills RP, Ashburn F, Hnik P, Van Coevorden RE.
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1910-7. PubMed ID: 9373125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of Matrix with Humphrey Field Analyzer II with SITA.
    Fredette MJ, Giguère A, Anderson DR, Budenz DL, McSoley J.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 25875683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparing a head-mounted virtual reality perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer for visual field testing in healthy and glaucoma patients.
    Phu J, Wang H, Kalloniatis M.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jan; 44(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 37803502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of Compass and Humphrey perimeters in detecting glaucomatous defects.
    Fogagnolo P, Modarelli A, Oddone F, Digiuni M, Montesano G, Orzalesi N, Rossetti L.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov 04; 26(6):598-606. PubMed ID: 27375066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of Humphrey Field Analyzer and imo visual field test results in patients with glaucoma and pseudo-fixation loss.
    Goukon H, Hirasawa K, Kasahara M, Matsumura K, Shoji N.
    PLoS One; 2019 Nov 04; 14(11):e0224711. PubMed ID: 31697732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Retinal Sensitivity Thresholds Obtained Through Easyfield and Humphrey Perimeters in Eyes with Glaucoma: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.
    Nazareth T, Rocha J, Scoralick ALB, Dias DT, Gracitelli CPB, Kanadani FN, Prata TS.
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov 04; 14():4201-4207. PubMed ID: 33299296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison between Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer: Performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer in healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients.
    Morbio R, Longo C, De Vitto AML, Comacchio F, Della Porta LB, Marchini G.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jul 04; 31(4):1850-1856. PubMed ID: 32722931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Perimetric Comparison Between the IMOvifa and Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Nishida T, Eslani M, Weinreb RN, Arias J, Vasile C, Mohammadzadeh V, Moghimi S.
    J Glaucoma; 2023 Feb 01; 32(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 36223309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Equating spatial summation in visual field testing reveals greater loss in optic nerve disease.
    Kalloniatis M, Khuu SK.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul 01; 36(4):439-52. PubMed ID: 27197562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of the Humphrey Field Analyser and Humphrey Matrix Perimeter for the evaluation of glaucoma patients.
    Chen YH, Wu JN, Chen JT, Lu DW.
    Ophthalmologica; 2008 Jul 01; 222(6):400-7. PubMed ID: 18781091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative Analysis of 10-2 Test on Advanced Vision Analyzer and Humphrey Perimeter in Glaucoma.
    Narang P, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Narang R, Sundaramoorthy L.
    Ophthalmol Sci; 2023 Jun 01; 3(2):100264. PubMed ID: 36846107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Measuring Visual Fields in Children With Glaucoma Using a Portable Tablet.
    Gupta V, Kong GXY, Singh A, Panigrahi A, Gupta S, Prea S, Vingrys AJ.
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2024 May 01; 13(5):10. PubMed ID: 38743410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.