These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
117 related items for PubMed ID: 17389789
1. Effects of maturation on parameters used for pass/fail criteria in neonatal hearing screening programmes using evoked otoacoustic emissions. Sadri M, Thornton AR, Kennedy CR. Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 17389789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance. Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Widen JE, Folsom RC, Sininger Y, Cone-Wesson B, Vohr BR, Mascher K, Fletcher K. Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Neonatal hearing screening: evaluation of tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emission test criteria. McPherson B, Li SF, Shi BX, Tang JL, Wong BY. Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 16672794 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions hearing screening in high-risk newborns. Salata JA, Jacobson JT, Strasnick B. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Jan; 118(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 9450826 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Newborn hearing screening by transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: analysis of response as a function of risk factors. De Capua B, De Felice C, Costantini D, Bagnoli F, Passali D. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2003 Feb; 23(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12812130 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of changes in click-evoked otoacoustic emission (CEOAE) pass criteria, as used in the English newborn hearing screening program, on screening outcome. Stevens J, Brandreth M, Bacon P. Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):613-7. PubMed ID: 24825366 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Linear" and "derived" otoacoustic emissions in newborns: a comparative study. Tognola G, Ravazzani P, Molini E, Ricci G, Alunni N, Parazzini M, Grandori F. Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):182-90. PubMed ID: 11409854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Otoacoustic emission criteria for neonatal hearing screening. Smyth V, McPherson B, Kei J, Young J, Tudehope D, Maurer M, Rankin G. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1999 Apr 25; 48(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10365967 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Newborn hearing screening by otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response. Doyle KJ, Burggraaff B, Fujikawa S, Kim J. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1997 Aug 20; 41(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 9306168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) recorded from neonates under 13 hours old using conventional and maximum length sequence (MLS) stimulation. de Boer J, Brennan S, Lineton B, Stevens J, Thornton AR. Hear Res; 2007 Nov 20; 233(1-2):86-96. PubMed ID: 17850998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening]. Liao H, Wu Z, Zhou T. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1999 Feb 20; 34(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 12764789 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for neonatal hearing screening in a hospital with high delivery rate. Ngui LX, Tang IP, Prepageran N, Lai ZW. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 May 20; 120():184-188. PubMed ID: 30844634 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry. Mathur NN, Dhawan R. J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul 20; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of two hearing screening protocols in NICU in Shanghai. Xu ZM, Cheng WX, Yang XL. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Oct 20; 75(10):1225-9. PubMed ID: 21802153 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission. Mehl AL, Thomson V. Pediatrics; 1998 Jan 20; 101(1):E4. PubMed ID: 9417168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Neonatal hearing screening in a low-risk maternity in São Paulo state. Kemp AA, Delecrode CR, Silva GC, Martins F, Frizzo AC, Cardoso AC. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Jan 20; 81(5):505-13. PubMed ID: 26277836 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: transient evoked otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period. Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Widen JE, Vohr BR, Folsom RC, Sininger YS, Cone-Wesson B, Fletcher KA. Ear Hear; 2000 Oct 20; 21(5):425-42. PubMed ID: 11059702 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of the number of averaged responses in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions on the results of neonatal hearing screening. Korres SG, Balatsouras DG, Economou C, Ferekidis E, Kandiloros D, Adamopoulos G. Audiology; 2000 Oct 20; 39(6):293-9. PubMed ID: 11766688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol. Johnson JL, White KR, Widen JE, Gravel JS, James M, Kennalley T, Maxon AB, Spivak L, Sullivan-Mahoney M, Vohr BR, Weirather Y, Holstrum J. Pediatrics; 2005 Sep 20; 116(3):663-72. PubMed ID: 16140706 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Newborn hearing screening at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and Auditory Brainstem Maturation in preterm infants. Ciorba A, Hatzopoulos S, Corazzi V, Cogliandolo C, Aimoni C, Bianchini C, Stomeo F, Pelucchi S. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Aug 20; 123():110-115. PubMed ID: 31096068 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]