These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

257 related items for PubMed ID: 17391871

  • 1. Survival and persistence of Lactobacillus plantarum 4.1 and Lactobacillus reuteri 3S7 in the gastrointestinal tract of pigs.
    De Angelis M, Siragusa S, Caputo L, Ragni A, Burzigotti R, Gobbetti M.
    Vet Microbiol; 2007 Jul 20; 123(1-3):133-44. PubMed ID: 17391871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Selection of potential probiotic lactobacilli from pig feces to be used as additives in pelleted feeding.
    De Angelis M, Siragusa S, Berloco M, Caputo L, Settanni L, Alfonsi G, Amerio M, Grandi A, Ragni A, Gobbetti M.
    Res Microbiol; 2006 Oct 20; 157(8):792-801. PubMed ID: 16844349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Isolation of swine-derived Lactobacillus plantarum and its synergistic antimicrobial and health-promoting properties with ZnO nanoparticles.
    Zheng L, Hu Y, He X, Zhao Y, Xu H.
    J Appl Microbiol; 2020 Jun 20; 128(6):1764-1775. PubMed ID: 32027448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In Vitro Evaluation of Swine-Derived Lactobacillus reuteri: Probiotic Properties and Effects on Intestinal Porcine Epithelial Cells Challenged with Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88.
    Wang Z, Wang L, Chen Z, Ma X, Yang X, Zhang J, Jiang Z.
    J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Jun 28; 26(6):1018-25. PubMed ID: 26907754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Alleviating Pentatrichomonas hominis-induced damage in IPEC-J2 cells: the beneficial influence of porcine-derived lactobacilli.
    Zhu Y, Cai H, Yan Z, Shen H, Fang S, Wang D, Liao S, Qi N, Lv M, Lin X, Hu J, Song Y, Chen X, Yin L, Zhang J, Li J, Sun M.
    Vet Res Commun; 2024 Aug 28; 48(4):2331-2342. PubMed ID: 38771449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Survival of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the human gastrointestinal tract with daily consumption of a low-fat probiotic spread.
    Dommels YE, Kemperman RA, Zebregs YE, Draaisma RB, Jol A, Wolvers DA, Vaughan EE, Albers R.
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2009 Oct 28; 75(19):6198-204. PubMed ID: 19684171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluating the Probiotic Potential of Lactobacillus plantarum Strains from Algerian Infant Feces: Towards the Design of Probiotic Starter Cultures Tailored for Developing Countries.
    Gheziel C, Russo P, Arena MP, Spano G, Ouzari HI, Kheroua O, Saidi D, Fiocco D, Kaddouri H, Capozzi V.
    Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins; 2019 Mar 28; 11(1):113-123. PubMed ID: 29460213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of oligosaccharides on the growth and stress tolerance of Lactobacillus plantarum ZLP001 in vitro, and the potential synbiotic effects of L. plantarum ZLP001 and fructo-oligosaccharide in post-weaning piglets1.
    Wang J, Wang S, Liu H, Zhang D, Wang Y, Ji H.
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Nov 04; 97(11):4588-4597. PubMed ID: 31410455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Experimental Evaluation of Host Adaptation of Lactobacillus reuteri to Different Vertebrate Species.
    Duar RM, Frese SA, Lin XB, Fernando SC, Burkey TE, Tasseva G, Peterson DA, Blom J, Wenzel CQ, Szymanski CM, Walter J.
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Jun 15; 83(12):. PubMed ID: 28389535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Susceptibility of gut indigenous lactic acid bacteria in BALB/c mice to oral administered Lactobacillus plantarum.
    Kuda T, Yokota Y, Haraguchi Y, Takahashi H, Kimura B.
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2019 Feb 15; 70(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 29768968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Probiotic lactobacilli interfere with Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation in vitro.
    Söderling EM, Marttinen AM, Haukioja AL.
    Curr Microbiol; 2011 Feb 15; 62(2):618-22. PubMed ID: 20835828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Genome sequence of the vertebrate gut symbiont Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 53608.
    Heavens D, Tailford LE, Crossman L, Jeffers F, Mackenzie DA, Caccamo M, Juge N.
    J Bacteriol; 2011 Aug 15; 193(15):4015-6. PubMed ID: 21622738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Transferability of a tetracycline resistance gene from probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri to bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract of humans.
    Egervärn M, Lindmark H, Olsson J, Roos S.
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2010 Feb 15; 97(2):189-200. PubMed ID: 19997864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Lactobacillus plantarum S27 from chicken faeces as a potential probiotic to replace antibiotics: in vivo evidence.
    Benbara T, Lalouche S, Drider D, Bendali F.
    Benef Microbes; 2020 Mar 27; 11(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 32131607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Lactobacillus plantarum AN1 cells increase caecal L. reuteri in an ICR mouse model of dextran sodium sulphate-induced inflammatory bowel disease.
    Yokota Y, Shikano A, Kuda T, Takei M, Takahashi H, Kimura B.
    Int Immunopharmacol; 2018 Mar 27; 56():119-127. PubMed ID: 29414641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Potential of Lactobacillus plantarum IBB3036 and Lactobacillus salivarius IBB3154 to persistence in chicken after in ovo delivery.
    Aleksandrzak-Piekarczyk T, Puzia W, Żylińska J, Cieśla J, Gulewicz KA, Bardowski JK, Górecki RK.
    Microbiologyopen; 2019 Jan 27; 8(1):e00620. PubMed ID: 29575743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of lactobacillus plantarum ZJ316 on pig growth and pork quality.
    Suo C, Yin Y, Wang X, Lou X, Song D, Wang X, Gu Q.
    BMC Vet Res; 2012 Jun 25; 8():89. PubMed ID: 22731747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.