These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

121 related items for PubMed ID: 1740803

  • 1. Use of skin staplers in experimental gastrointestinal injuries.
    Dawson DL, Coil JA, Jadali M, Garrett G.
    J Trauma; 1992 Feb; 32(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 1740803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. In-continuity gastrointestinal stapling.
    Mulholland MW, Magallanes F, Quigley TM, Delaney JP.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 1983 Sep; 26(9):586-9. PubMed ID: 6347569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Closure of gastrointestinal incisions using skin staples alone and in combination with suture in 29 cats.
    Schwartz Z, Coolman BR.
    J Small Anim Pract; 2018 May; 59(5):281-285. PubMed ID: 29617039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Lactomer copolymer absorbable staples in gastrointestinal surgery.
    Hirashima T, Eto T, DenBesten L.
    Am J Surg; 1985 Sep; 150(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 4037202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of staples versus sutures in the repair of penetrating cardiac wounds.
    Mayrose J, Jehle DV, Moscati R, Lerner EB, Abrams BJ.
    J Trauma; 1999 Mar; 46(3):441-3; discussion 443-4. PubMed ID: 10088847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of two closure techniques for the repair of experimental colonic perforations.
    Edwards DP, Warren BF, Galbraith KA, Watkins PE.
    Br J Surg; 1999 Apr; 86(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 10215827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Disposable skin staplers for closure of linear gastrointestinal incisions in dogs.
    Schwartz Z, Coolman BR.
    Vet Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):285-292. PubMed ID: 29218712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Value of absorbable stapling in digestive surgery? Experimental study comparing TA metallic stapling, TA absorbable stapling and manual sutures].
    Lehur PA, Gaillard F, Visset J.
    J Chir (Paris); 1986 Oct; 123(10):563-9. PubMed ID: 3805171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Skin stapling of wounds in the accident department.
    MacGregor FB, McCombe AW, King PM, Macleod DA.
    Injury; 1989 Nov; 20(6):347-8. PubMed ID: 2628331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Use of skin stapler in dermatologic surgery.
    Stegmaier OC.
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 1982 Mar; 6(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 7068959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Gastrointestinal anastomoses constructed with singly placed staples.
    Chung RS.
    Am J Surg; 1980 Jun; 139(6):876-9. PubMed ID: 6992616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of automatic disposable rotating cartridge skin staplers.
    Phung D, Abidin MR, Thacker JG, Rodeheaver GT, Westwater JJ, Doctor A, Edlich RF.
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1988 Jun; 9(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 3192614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Transluminal closure for NOTES: an ex vivo study comparing leak pressures of various gastrotomy and colotomy closure modalities.
    Ryou M, Fong DG, Pai RD, Rattner DW, Thompson CC.
    Endoscopy; 2008 May; 40(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 18404600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.