These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

801 related items for PubMed ID: 17412053

  • 21. Medicare Part D: successes and continuing challenges. Impact of Medicare Part D on Massachusetts health programs and beneficiaries.
    Thomas CP, Sussman J, Massachusettes Health Policy Forum, Massachusetts Medicaid Policy Institute.
    Issue Brief (Mass Health Policy Forum); 2007 May 30; (32):1-32. PubMed ID: 17546802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Incentives in the Medicare prescription drug benefit.
    Natl Bur Econ Res Bull Aging Health; 2006 May 30; (15):1-2. PubMed ID: 16805056
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Part D decisions: like other employers, many states are collecting a new federal subsidy for maintaining retiree drug coverage--but for many, that's not their "final answer".
    Burton R, Folkemer D.
    State Legis; 2006 Sep 30; 32(8):26-7. PubMed ID: 16958187
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. State execs say repeal Medicare drug benefit.
    Am Pharm; 1989 Nov 30; NS29(11):20-1. PubMed ID: 2683705
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Privacy Act of 1974; systems of records--HCFA. Deletion of Privacy Act System of Records from HCFA Inventory.
    Fed Regist; 1990 Feb 28; 55(40):7035. PubMed ID: 10106392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Catastrophic health insurance--impact on drug services, delivery and use: reactions and observations.
    Rucker TD.
    Am J Pharm Educ; 1989 Feb 28; 53(4):368-9. PubMed ID: 10304256
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comparing prescription drug plans. New choices made available by Medicare Part D deserve serious study.
    AVMA Group Health & Life Insurance Trust.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2005 Dec 15; 227(12):1884-5. PubMed ID: 16382541
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Employers' reactions to the Clinton prescription drug proposal.
    J Nurs Adm; 2000 Dec 15; 30(12):567-8. PubMed ID: 11138597
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Medicare prescription drug benefit realities.
    Cundiff DK.
    MedGenMed; 2003 Dec 10; 5(4):28. PubMed ID: 14745375
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Adverse selection in private, stand-alone drug plans and techniques to reduce it.
    Boccuti C, Moon M.
    Policy Brief Commonw Fund; 2003 Oct 10; (681):1-9. PubMed ID: 14562798
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Medicare program; monthly actuarial rates, supplementary medical insurance premium rate, and catastrophic coverage premium beginning January 1, 1990--HCFA. Correction.
    Fed Regist; 1989 Dec 07; 54(234):50581-2. PubMed ID: 10304085
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. PBMs and a Medicare prescription drug benefit.
    Cohen JP.
    Food Drug Law J; 2000 Dec 07; 55(3):311-20. PubMed ID: 11824463
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 41.