These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

352 related items for PubMed ID: 17414979

  • 1. Computer-assisted spinal navigation versus serial radiography and operative time for posterior spinal fusion at L5-S1.
    Sasso RC, Garrido BJ.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Apr; 20(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 17414979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of single-time, multilevel registration in image-guided spinal surgery.
    Papadopoulos EC, Girardi FP, Sama A, Sandhu HS, Cammisa FP.
    Spine J; 2005 Apr; 5(3):263-7; discussion 268. PubMed ID: 15863081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Posterior lumbar fusion using the O-arm surgical imaging system: initial experience].
    Castro Castro J, Rodino Padín J, Pinzón Millán A, Agulleiro Díaz JP, Villa Fernández JM, Pastor Zapata A.
    Neurocirugia (Astur); 2013 Apr; 24(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 23246338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The accuracy of 3D image navigation with a cutaneously fixed dynamic reference frame in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Cho JY, Chan CK, Lee SH, Lee HY.
    Comput Aided Surg; 2012 Apr; 17(6):300-9. PubMed ID: 23098190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Spinal navigation: standard preoperative versus intraoperative computed tomography data set acquisition for computer-guidance system: radiological and clinical study in 100 consecutive patients.
    Costa F, Cardia A, Ortolina A, Fabio G, Zerbi A, Fornari M.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Nov 15; 36(24):2094-8. PubMed ID: 21304425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical outcomes following spinal fusion using an intraoperative computed tomographic 3D imaging system.
    Xiao R, Miller JA, Sabharwal NC, Lubelski D, Alentado VJ, Healy AT, Mroz TE, Benzel EC.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May 15; 26(5):628-637. PubMed ID: 28291408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Prospective screw misplacement analysis after conventional and navigated pedicle screw implantation].
    Seller K, Wild A, Urselmann L, Krauspe R.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Sep 15; 50(9):287-92. PubMed ID: 16185038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy over space and time of computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation in the lumbar spine in vivo.
    Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Robert Kolen E, Jun P, Rosenberg WS, Weinstein PR.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr 15; 19(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 16760784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Image-guided spine surgery: a cadaver study comparing conventional open laminoforaminotomy and two image-guided techniques for pedicle screw placement in posterolateral fusion and nonfusion models.
    Austin MS, Vaccaro AR, Brislin B, Nachwalter R, Hilibrand AS, Albert TJ.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Nov 15; 27(22):2503-8. PubMed ID: 12435982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of novel machine vision spinal image guidance system with existing 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation system: a randomized prospective study.
    Malham GM, Munday NR.
    Spine J; 2022 Apr 15; 22(4):561-569. PubMed ID: 34666179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of cranial facet joint violation rates between open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement using intraoperative 3-D CT (O-arm) computer navigation.
    Yson SC, Sembrano JN, Sanders PC, Santos ER, Ledonio CG, Polly DW.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb 15; 38(4):E251-8. PubMed ID: 23197012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Reduction of radiation exposure by the use of fluoroscopic guidance in transpedicular instrumentation].
    Hart R, Komzák M, Bárta R, Okál F, Srůtková E.
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2011 Feb 15; 78(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 22094160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Learning curve of 3D fluoroscopy image-guided pedicle screw placement in the thoracolumbar spine.
    Ryang YM, Villard J, Obermüller T, Friedrich B, Wolf P, Gempt J, Ringel F, Meyer B.
    Spine J; 2015 Mar 01; 15(3):467-76. PubMed ID: 25315133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a matched cohort comparison.
    Schatlo B, Molliqaj G, Cuvinciuc V, Kotowski M, Schaller K, Tessitore E.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jun 01; 20(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 24725180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fluoroscopy vs computer-assisted image guidance with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging.
    Smith HE, Welsch MD, Sasso RC, Vaccaro AR.
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2008 Jun 01; 31(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 19086710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Single versus separate registration for computer-assisted lumbar pedicle screw placement.
    Lee TC, Yang LC, Liliang PC, Su TM, Rau CS, Chen HJ.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jul 15; 29(14):1585-9. PubMed ID: 15247584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.