These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

665 related items for PubMed ID: 17417152

  • 1. [Clinical evaluation of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer].
    Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Detry MB, Ledoux A, Pourjavan S.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2007 Mar; 30(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 17417152
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF.
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
    Umurhan Akkan JC, Akkan F, Sezgin Akcay BI, Ayintap E, Tuncer K.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann and pneumotonometer in ocular hypertension patients and their relationship to pachymetry and ocular pulse amplitude].
    Colás-Tomás T, Prieto-Del Cura M, Villafruela-Güemes I, Clariana-Martín A, Valdivia-Pérez A.
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2012 Dec; 87(12):401-6. PubMed ID: 23121701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
    Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Brusini P.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Dynamic contour tonometry in primary open angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma: factors associated with intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude.
    Moghimi S, Torabi H, Fakhraie G, Nassiri N, Mohammadi M.
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2013 May; 20(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 23741135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Intraocular pressure and ocular pulse amplitude comparisons in different types of glaucoma using dynamic contour tonometry.
    Punjabi OS, Ho HK, Kniestedt C, Bostrom AG, Stamper RL, Lin SC.
    Curr Eye Res; 2006 Oct; 31(10):851-62. PubMed ID: 17050277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Clinical evaluation of the dynamic rebound tonometer Icare].
    Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Detry MB, Pourjavan S, Charlier L, Dethinne B, Huge L, Ledoux A.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2006 Dec; 29(10):1119-27. PubMed ID: 17211320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A, White ET, Shewry JM, Garway-Heath DF.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M, Halverson KD, Qualls C.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
    Halkiadakis I, Patsea E, Chatzimichali K, Skouriotis S, Chalkidou S, Amariotakis G, Papakonstadinou D, Theodossiadis G, Amariotakis A, Georgopoulos G.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
    Park SJ, Ang GS, Nicholas S, Wells AP.
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.
    Barleon L, Hoffmann EM, Berres M, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 17011849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Clinical assessment of dynamic contour tonometer].
    Shi W, Zhong Y, Dong FT, Xu P, Wang RY.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 May; 44(5):408-12. PubMed ID: 18953894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Factors affecting ocular pulse amplitude in eyes with open angle glaucoma and glaucoma-suspect eyes.
    Choi J, Lee J, Park SB, Lee KS, Sung KR, Kook MS.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 90(6):552-8. PubMed ID: 20560890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
    Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E, Fernandez-Vidal A, Benitez del Castillo JM, Wasfi M, Garcia-Sanchez J.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 34.