These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues. Gan N, Xiong Y, Jiao T. PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Interocclusal record fabricated with bis-acrylic composite resin and vinyl polysiloxane registration material. Vivas JL, Sierraalta M. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):199-200. PubMed ID: 19703631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study. Reddy JM, Prashanti E, Kumar GV, Suresh Sajjan MC, Mathew X. Indian J Dent Res; 2009 Mar; 20(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20139562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study. Schaefer O, Schmidt M, Goebel R, Kuepper H. J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 22944312 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. InLab and Cerec Connect: virtual contacts in maximum intercuspation compared with original contacts--an in vitro study. Nemli SK, Wolfart S, Reich S. Int J Comput Dent; 2012 Sep; 15(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 22930945 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]