These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

159 related items for PubMed ID: 17425387

  • 1. Ensuring timely completion of type and screen testing and the verification of ABO/Rh status for elective surgical patients.
    Saxena S, Nelson JM, Osby M, Shah M, Kempf R, Shulman IA.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Apr; 131(4):576-81. PubMed ID: 17425387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Suitability of preadmission blood samples for pretransfusion testing in elective surgery.
    Marosszeky S, McDonald S, Sutherland J, Haysom H, Haeusler M, Sellings C, Metz J, McGrath KM.
    Transfusion; 1997 Sep; 37(9):910-2. PubMed ID: 9308636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. North American pretransfusion testing practices, 2001-2004: results from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program survey data, 2001-2004.
    Shulman IA, Maffei LM, Downes KA.
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):984-9. PubMed ID: 16048410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Thirty-day typing and screening for patients undergoing elective surgery: experience at a large cancer center.
    Narvios AB, Rozner M, Lichtiger B.
    Transfusion; 2006 Mar; 46(3):348-51. PubMed ID: 16533275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Incomplete pretransfusion testing leads to surgical delays.
    McWilliams B, Yazer MH, Cramer J, Triulzi DJ, Waters JH.
    Transfusion; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2139-44; quiz 2145. PubMed ID: 22348700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The suitability of hemolyzed specimens for compatibility testing using automated technology.
    Laga A, Cheves T, Maroto S, Coutts M, Sweeney J.
    Transfusion; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1713-20. PubMed ID: 18482191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Pretransfusion testing without serologic crossmatch: approaches to ensure patient safety.
    Kuriyan M, Fox E.
    Vox Sang; 2000 Aug; 78(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 10765147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Electronic verification of donor-recipient compatibility: the computer crossmatch.
    Butch SH, Judd WJ, Steiner EA, Stoe M, Oberman HA.
    Transfusion; 1994 Feb; 34(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 8310478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Double standard for double ABO grouping?
    Mintz PD, Dzik WH.
    Transfusion; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1282-5. PubMed ID: 19602208
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Pretransfusion tests and compatibility: questions of safety and efficacy.
    Masouredis SP.
    Blood; 1982 May; 59(5):873-5. PubMed ID: 6803855
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of polyethylene terephthalate for ABO and Rh typing and alloantibody screening.
    Anderson DR, Wiseman J, MacLeod J, Burton E, Zayed E.
    Transfusion; 2000 Jun; 40(6):669-72. PubMed ID: 10864986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.