These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

240 related items for PubMed ID: 17427819

  • 21. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite in class V carious lesions: 3-year results.
    Demirci M, Ersev H, Topçubaşi M, Uçok M.
    Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep; 24(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 16279721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Clinical evaluation of resin-based composites in posterior restorations: two-year results.
    Arhun N, Celik C, Yamanel K.
    Oper Dent; 2010 Sep; 35(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 20672723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Mönting JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Sep; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW.
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study.
    Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, Kavvadia K.
    Pediatr Dent; 1999 Jun; 21(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 10436476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF.
    J Adhes Dent; 2003 Nov; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract AP) in class I cavities: 5-year results.
    Demircia M.
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Dec; 9(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 18265712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results.
    Cehreli ZC, Cetinguc A, Cengiz SB, Altay AN.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 17073200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Comparative clinical evaluation of different treatment approaches using a microfilled resin composite and a compomer in Class III cavities: two-year results.
    Demirci M, Yildiz E, Uysal O.
    Oper Dent; 2008 Oct; 33(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 18335727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite.
    Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Mönting JS.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
    Chinelatti MA, Ramos RP, Chimello DT, Palma-Dibb RG.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Noncarious cervical lesions restored with three different tooth-colored materials: two-year results.
    Stojanac IL, Premovic MT, Ramic BD, Drobac MR, Stojsin IM, Petrovic LM.
    Oper Dent; 2013 Mar; 38(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 22856681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: a two-year clinical trial.
    Türkün LS, Celik EU.
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 19058687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Repair of dimethacrylate-based composite restorations by a silorane-based composite: a one-year randomized clinical trial.
    Popoff DA, Santa Rosa TT, Ferreira RC, Magalhães CS, Moreira AN, Mjör IA.
    Oper Dent; 2012 Oct; 37(5):E1-10. PubMed ID: 22616930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results.
    Busato AL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Carrilho MR.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. A clinical evaluation of a giomer restorative system containing surface prereacted glass ionomer filler: results from a 13-year recall examination.
    Gordan VV, Blaser PK, Watson RE, Mjör IA, McEdward DL, Sensi LG, Riley JL.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Oct; 145(10):1036-43. PubMed ID: 25270702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report.
    Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R.
    J Adhes Dent; 2001 Oct; 3(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 11570687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
    Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Oct; 25(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 11203859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.