These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Predisposing conditions for condylar sag after intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy. Rokutanda S, Yamada SI, Yanamoto S, Sakamoto H, Omori K, Rokutanda H, Yoshimi T, Fujishita A, Morita Y, Yoshida N, Umeda M. Sci Rep; 2021 May 17; 11(1):10463. PubMed ID: 34001999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of different treatment procedures on the temporomandibular joint after mandibular setback in skeletal class III - A retrospective study. Ohba S, Tominaga J, Shido R, Koga T, Yamamoto H, Zaiima H, Yoshida N, Asahina I. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Sep 17; 50(9):712-718. PubMed ID: 35987801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial. Li DTS, Wang R, Wong NSM, Leung YY. J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan 17; 50(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 34627665 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Condylar and disc positions after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with and without Le Fort I osteotomy. Ueki K, Marukawa K, Shimada M, Hashiba Y, Nakgawa K, Yamamoto E. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Mar 17; 103(3):342-8. PubMed ID: 17321444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback. Yoshioka I, Khanal A, Tominaga K, Horie A, Furuta N, Fukuda J. J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun 17; 66(6):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18486778 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies. Chen CM, Tseng YC, Ko EC, Chen MY, Chen KJ, Cheng JH. Biomed Res Int; 2018 Jun 17; 2018():1375085. PubMed ID: 30662900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of the quality of life changes of patients receiving sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy for mandibular prognathism. Wong NSM, Leung YY. Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Apr 17; 27(4):1435-1448. PubMed ID: 36881158 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. MRI changes in the temporomandibular joint following mandibular setback surgery using sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation. Takahara N, Kabasawa Y, Sato M, Tetsumura A, Kurabayashi T, Omura K. Cranio; 2017 Jan 17; 35(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 27077250 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism. Lai SS, Tseng YC, Huang IY, Yang YH, Shen YS, Chen CM. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007 Jan 17; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Three-dimensional evaluation of positional change of the condyle after mandibular setback by means of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Lee W, Park JU. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Sep 17; 94(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 12324783 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]