These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

215 related items for PubMed ID: 1743193

  • 1. Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Kheddache S, Månsson LG, Angelhed JE, Denbratt L, Gottfridsson B, Schlossman D.
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 1743193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Digital chest radiography: should images be presented in negative or positive mode?
    Kheddache S, Månsson LG, Angelhed JE, Denbratt L, Gottfridson B, Schlossman D.
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 1743194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Börjesson J, Mattsson S, Schlossman D.
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C, Aberle DR, Sayre JW, Hart EM, Greaves SM, Brown K, Young DA, Deseran MD, Johnson T, Johnson SL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Conventional film-screen versus computed storage phosphor radiography. Simulated miliary lung disease in an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Mosser H, Pärtan G, Urban M, Krampla W, Ottes F, Hruby W.
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Mar; 30(3):186-91. PubMed ID: 7797418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. Evaluation of diagnostic performance and patient exposure.
    Månsson LG, Kheddache S, Schlossman D, Börjesson J, Håkansson E, Mattsson S, Tylén U.
    Acta Radiol; 1989 Mar; 30(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 2775592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [ROC analysis in post-processing of image data in digital thoracic radiography].
    Müller RD, Hirche H, Voss M, Buddenbrock B, John V, Gocke P.
    Rofo; 1995 Feb; 162(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 7881085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U, Hoeschen C, Effenberger O, Fessel A, Preuss H, Reissberg S, Scherlach C, Döhring W.
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
    Håkansson M, Båth M, Börjesson S, Kheddache S, Johnsson AA, Månsson LG.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Feb; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
    Kool LJ, Busscher DL, Vlasbloem H, Hermans J, vd Merwe PC, Algra PR, Herstel W.
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Digital radiography and conventional imaging of the chest: a comparison of observer performance.
    Thaete FL, Fuhrman CR, Oliver JH, Britton CA, Campbell WL, Feist JH, Straub WH, Davis PL, Plunkett MB.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Mar; 162(3):575-81. PubMed ID: 8109499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
    Elam EA, Rehm K, Hillman BJ, Maloney K, Fajardo LL, McNeill K.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules.
    Chakraborty DP, Breatnach ES, Yester MV, Soto B, Barnes GT, Fraser RG.
    Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3940394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography.
    Müller RD, Wähling S, Hirche H, Voss M, Blendl C, Gocke C, Gocke P, Buddenbrock B, John V, Wiebringhaus R, Turowski B.
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor and hard-copy.
    Kehler M, Albrechtsson U, Arnadóttir E, Ebbesen A, Hochbergs P, Lundin A, Lyttkens K, Kheddache K, Månsson LG, Angelhed JE.
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Mar; 33(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 1562402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M, Stamati R, Burci P, Sartoni Galloni S, Guidarelli G, Pastori R.
    Radiol Med; 1993 Mar; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.
    MacMahon H, Doi K, Sanada S, Montner SM, Giger ML, Metz CE, Nakamori N, Yin FF, Xu XW, Yonekawa H.
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1984299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of an enhanced digital film-duplication system by receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Hoffmann KR, MacMahon H, Doi K, Metz CE, Yao L, Abe K.
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Dec; 28(12):1134-8. PubMed ID: 8307717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.