These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

729 related items for PubMed ID: 1743273

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Understanding U.S. fertility: continuity and change in the National Survey of Family Growth, 1988-1995.
    Mosher WD, Bachrach CA.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 8822409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Racial fertility differences: the role of female employment and education in wanted and unwanted childbearing.
    Burr JA, Bean FD.
    Soc Biol; 1996; 43(3-4):218-41. PubMed ID: 9204698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Understanding U.S. fertility: findings from the National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle III.
    Pratt WF, Mosher WD, Bachrach CA, Horn MC.
    Popul Bull; 1984 Dec; 39(5):3-42. PubMed ID: 12266654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Second pregnancies among teenage mothers.
    Ford K.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983 Dec; 15(6):268-72. PubMed ID: 6667732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The socioeconomic consequences of teenage childbearing: findings from a natural experiment.
    Grogger J, Bronars S.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1993 Dec; 25(4):156-61, 174. PubMed ID: 8405341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Determinants of couple agreement in U.S. fertility decisions.
    Williams LB.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1994 Dec; 26(4):169-73. PubMed ID: 7957819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fertility of American women: June 1981 (advance report).
    United States. Bureau of the Census.
    Curr Popul Rep Popul Charact; 1982 Mar; (369):1-4. PubMed ID: 12158809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Intention status of U.S. births in 1988: differences by mothers' socioeconomic and demographic characteristics.
    Kost K, Forrest JD.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1995 Mar; 27(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 7720847
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982-1995.
    Piccinino LJ, Mosher WD.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998 Mar; 30(1):4-10, 46. PubMed ID: 9494809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Black America in the 1980s.
    Reid J.
    Popul Bull; 1982 Dec; 37(4):1-39. PubMed ID: 12338496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. An assessment of contraceptive need in the inner city.
    Radecki SE, Bernstein GS.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1990 Dec; 22(3):122-7, 144. PubMed ID: 2379569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Is Medicaid pronatalist? The effect of eligibility expansions on abortions and births.
    Joyce T, Kaestner R, Kwan F.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998 Dec; 30(3):108-13, 127. PubMed ID: 9635258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A case study of race differences among late abortion patients.
    Lynxwiler J, Wilson M.
    Women Health; 1994 Dec; 21(4):43-56. PubMed ID: 7941610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Determinants of child-bearing intentions of low-income women: attitudes versus life circumstances.
    Radecki SE, Beckman LJ.
    J Biosoc Sci; 1992 Apr; 24(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 1583030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 37.