These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

604 related items for PubMed ID: 17444553

  • 1. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
    Tan PC, Vallikkannu N, Suguna S, Quek KF, Hassan J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
    Strobel E, Sladkevicius P, Rovas L, De Smet F, Karlsson ED, Valentin L.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Ramanathan VG, Thompson MO, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor.
    Gómez-Laencina AM, García CP, Asensio LV, Ponce JA, Martínez MS, Martínez-Vizcaíno V.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 22198844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.
    Han BR, Park KH, Lee SY, Jung EY, Park JW.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women.
    Park KH.
    J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Aug; 22(4):722-7. PubMed ID: 17728517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Roos C, Arabin B, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cervical assessment at 22 and 27 weeks for the prediction of spontaneous birth before 34 weeks in twin pregnancies: is transvaginal sonography more accurate than digital examination?
    Vayssière C, Favre R, Audibert F, Chauvet MP, Gaucherand P, Tardif D, Grangé G, Novoa A, Descamps P, Perdu M, Andrini E, Janse-Marec J, Maillard F, Nisand I, Research Group in Obstetrics and Gynecology (GROG).
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Dec; 26(7):707-12. PubMed ID: 16273595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
    Gomes F, Ramalho C, Machado AP, Calado E, Cardoso F, Montenegro N.
    Acta Med Port; 2006 Dec; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
    Uyar Y, Erbay G, Demir BC, Baytur Y.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Pre-induction cervical assessment using transvaginal ultrasound versus Bishops cervical scoring as predictors of successful induction of labour in term pregnancies: A hospital-based comparative clinical trial.
    Abdullah ZHA, Chew KT, Velayudham VRV, Yahaya Z, Jamil AAM, Abu MA, Ghani NAA, Ismail NAM.
    PLoS One; 2022 Sep; 17(1):e0262387. PubMed ID: 35081157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Ultrasound and clinical predictors for Caesarean delivery after labour induction at term.
    Tan PC, Suguna S, Vallikkannu N, Hassan J.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Dec; 46(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 17116055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The predictive value of cervical shear wave elastography in the outcome of labor induction.
    Lu J, Cheng YKY, Ho SYS, Sahota DS, Hui LL, Poon LC, Leung TY.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 31691266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour.
    Elghorori MR, Hassan I, Dartey W, Abdel-Aziz E, Bradley M.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Aug; 26(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 17000497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.