These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 17452172

  • 1. Comparison of a five-degree visual field between two programs of different testing field range.
    Fujimoto N.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):866-7. PubMed ID: 17452172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
    Huang CQ, Carolan J, Redline D, Taravati P, Woodward KR, Johnson CA, Wall M, Keltner JL.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B, Heijl A.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The visual field indices in primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Flanagan JG, Wild JM, Trope GE.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 34(7):2266-74. PubMed ID: 8505208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM, Kim LS, Pacey IE, Cunliffe IA.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
    Agarwal HC, Gulati V, Sihota R.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The macular automated photostress test.
    Dhalla MS, Fantin A, Blinder KJ, Bakal JA.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Apr; 143(4):596-600. PubMed ID: 17303062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY, Dodge RM, Remington LA.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
    Wild JM, Pacey IE, O'Neill EC, Cunliffe IA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of input data on the performance of a neural network in distinguishing normal and glaucomatous visual fields.
    Bengtsson B, Bizios D, Heijl A.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Oct; 46(10):3730-6. PubMed ID: 16186356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the high specificity Screening Program (C-20-1) of the Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimeter in clinical practice.
    North RV, Jones AL, Hunter E, Morgan JE, Wild JM.
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Jun; 20(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 15999135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The relationship between visual disability and visual field in patients with glaucoma.
    Sumi I, Shirato S, Matsumoto S, Araie M.
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Feb; 110(2):332-9. PubMed ID: 12578777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of an effective visual field testing strategy for a normal pediatric population.
    Akar Y, Yilmaz A, Yucel I.
    Ophthalmologica; 2008 Feb; 222(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 18617757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Characteristics of frequency-of-seeing curves in normal subjects, patients with suspected glaucoma, and patients with glaucoma.
    Chauhan BC, Tompkins JD, LeBlanc RP, McCormick TA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Dec; 34(13):3534-40. PubMed ID: 8258511
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Retinal sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.
    Miglior S, Riva I, Guareschi M, Di Matteo F, Romanazzi F, Buffagni L, Rulli E.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Nov; 144(5):733-740. PubMed ID: 17707327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Poly-static quantitative perimetry for detection of open angle glaucoma].
    Lai Z, Lao Y, Ai F.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Mar; 36(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 11853601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT.
    Nomoto H, Matsumoto C, Takada S, Hashimoto S, Arimura E, Okuyama S, Shimomura Y.
    J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Rapid Tendency Oriented Perimeter (TOP) with the Octopus visual field analyzer].
    Lachkar Y, Barrault O, Lefrançois A, Demailly P.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Mar; 21(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 9759403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of diagnostic protocols for interpretation of frequency doubling perimetry visual fields in glaucoma.
    Landers J, Sharma A, Goldberg I, Graham S.
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 16865008
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.