These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

189 related items for PubMed ID: 17453456

  • 1. Differences between electrode-assigned frequencies and cochlear implant recipient pitch perception.
    Nardo WD, Cantore I, Cianfrone F, Melillo P, Fetoni AR, Paludetti G.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):370-7. PubMed ID: 17453456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cochlear implant patients' speech understanding in background noise: effect of mismatch between electrode assigned frequencies and perceived pitch.
    Di Nardo W, Scorpecci A, Giannantonio S, Cianfrone F, Parrilla C, Paludetti G.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Aug; 124(8):828-34. PubMed ID: 20202276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U, Rader T, Helbig S, Bahmer A.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Aug; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA, Battmer RD, Pesch J.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Electric to acoustic pitch matching: a possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting.
    Nardo WD, Cantore I, Marchese MR, Cianfrone F, Scorpecci A, Giannantonio S, Paludetti G.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Nov; 265(11):1321-8. PubMed ID: 18379812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Results of partial deafness cochlear implantation using various electrode designs.
    Skarzyński H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Podskarbi-Fayette R.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Nov; 14 Suppl 1():39-45. PubMed ID: 19390174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users.
    Koch DB, Downing M, Osberger MJ, Litvak L.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):38S-41S. PubMed ID: 17496643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant.
    Henkin Y, Kaplan-Neeman R, Kronenberg J, Migirov L, Hildesheimer M, Muchnik C.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 16720441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS, Throckmorton CS, Collins LM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Perceptual dissimilarities among acoustic stimuli and ipsilateral electric stimuli.
    McDermott HJ, Sucher CM.
    Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 218(1-2):81-8. PubMed ID: 16777362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.