These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


749 related items for PubMed ID: 17456674

  • 1. Cricoid pressure impedes insertion of, and ventilation through, the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, paralyzed patients.
    Li CW, Xue FS, Xu YC, Liu Y, Mao P, Liu KP, Yang QY, Zhang GH, Sun HT.
    Anesth Analg; 2007 May; 104(5):1195-8, tables of contents. PubMed ID: 17456674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Influence of pressure on cricoid on insertion ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and ventilation function].
    Xue FS, Mao P, Li CW, Xu YC, Yang QY, Liu Y, Liu KP, Sun HT.
    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2007 Sep; 19(9):532-5. PubMed ID: 17767821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
    Xue FS, Mao P, Liu HP, Yang QY, Li CW, He N, Xu YC, Liao X.
    Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 18699873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
    Eschertzhuber S, Brimacombe J, Hohlrieder M, Keller C.
    Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Randomized prospective study comparing the laryngeal tube suction II with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized and paralyzed patients.
    Kikuchi T, Kamiya Y, Ohtsuka T, Miki T, Goto T.
    Anesthesiology; 2008 Jul; 109(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 18580172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [An auto control comparison of the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and standard laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation].
    Li CW, Xue FS, Mao P, Xu YC, Liu Y, Zhang GH, Liu KP, Sun HT.
    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2007 Feb; 19(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 17326908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients.
    Theiler LG, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A, Greif R, Unibe MM.
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Jul; 111(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 19512881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [The ProSeal-LM, a new variant of the laryngeal mask: description and first clinical results].
    Füllekrug B, Reissmann H, Pothmann W, Masch T, Schulte am Esch J.
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2001 Apr; 36(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 11386091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Comparison of different laryngeal mask airways in a resuscitation model].
    Genzwürker H, Hundt A, Finteis T, Ellinger K.
    Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Feb; 38(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 12557121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal.
    Hosten T, Gurkan Y, Ozdamar D, Tekin M, Toker K, Solak M.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Aug; 53(7):852-7. PubMed ID: 19426239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Prospective randomized comparison of the new Laryngeal Tube Suction LTS II and the LMA-ProSeal for elective surgical interventions.
    Genzwuerker HV, Altmayer S, Hinkelbein J, Gernoth C, Viergutz T, Ocker H.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Nov; 51(10):1373-7. PubMed ID: 17944641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is superior to conventional tracheal intubation by first-month anesthesia residents after brief manikin-only training.
    Hohlrieder M, Brimacombe J, von Goedecke A, Keller C.
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Aug; 103(2):458-62, table of contents. PubMed ID: 16861434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.
    Timmermann A, Cremer S, Eich C, Kazmaier S, Bräuer A, Graf BM, Russo SG.
    Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of the laryngeal tube-S and Proseal laryngeal mask during outpatient surgical procedures.
    Zand F, Amini A, Sadeghi SE, Gureishi M, Chohedri A.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):847-51. PubMed ID: 17608965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study.
    Tham HM, Tan SM, Woon KL, Zhao YD.
    Can J Anaesth; 2010 Jul; 57(7):672-8. PubMed ID: 20411444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A study of airway management using the ProSeal LMA laryngeal mask airway compared with the tracheal tube on postoperative analgesia requirements following gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
    Hohlrieder M, Brimacombe J, Eschertzhuber S, Ulmer H, Keller C.
    Anaesthesia; 2007 Sep; 62(9):913-8. PubMed ID: 17697218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical Evaluation of the Cricoid Pressure Effect on Bag Mask Ventilation, ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Placement and Ventilation.
    Joshi S, Prakash S, Mullick P, Usha G, Pawar M.
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2018 Sep; 46(5):381-387. PubMed ID: 30263862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of the VBM laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask airway for ventilation during manual in-line neck stabilisation.
    Noor Zairul M, Khairul Faizi A.
    Singapore Med J; 2006 Oct; 47(10):892-6. PubMed ID: 16990966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Positive pressure ventilation with the size 5 laryngeal mask.
    Brimacombe JR.
    J Clin Anesth; 1997 Mar; 9(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 9075035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway.
    Goldmann K, Roettger C, Wulf H.
    Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 16428533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 38.