These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

199 related items for PubMed ID: 17458786

  • 1. Comparison of tendency-oriented perimetry and dynamic strategy in octopus perimetry as a screening tool in a clinical setting: a prospective study.
    Scherrer M, Fleischhauer JC, Helbig H, Johann Auf der Heide K, Sutter FK.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2007 Apr; 224(4):252-4. PubMed ID: 17458786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.
    King AJ, Taguri A, Wadood AC, Azuara-Blanco A.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Jun; 240(6):481-7. PubMed ID: 12107516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Computer perimetry--rapid TOP (tendency oriented perimetry) and normal threshold methods in clinical practice--comparison of results].
    Kratochvilová P.
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2002 May; 58(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 12087665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
    Pierre-Filho Pde T, Schimiti RB, de Vasconcellos JP, Costa VP.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Rapid Tendency Oriented Perimeter (TOP) with the Octopus visual field analyzer].
    Lachkar Y, Barrault O, Lefrançois A, Demailly P.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1998 Mar; 21(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 9759403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients.
    Bozkurt B, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M.
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Mar; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison between semiautomated kinetic perimetry and conventional Goldmann manual kinetic perimetry in advanced visual field loss.
    Nowomiejska K, Vonthein R, Paetzold J, Zagorski Z, Kardon R, Schiefer U.
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1343-54. PubMed ID: 15996734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [The value of frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma screening of aged 40 or more population].
    Li JJ, Xu L, Zhang RX, Sun XY, Yang H, Zou Y, Zhao JL.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 41(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 15840362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Three-dimensional high-speed optical coherence tomography imaging of lamina cribrosa in glaucoma.
    Inoue R, Hangai M, Kotera Y, Nakanishi H, Mori S, Morishita S, Yoshimura N.
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):214-22. PubMed ID: 19091413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The usefulness of the Noise-Field Test as a screening method for visual field defects.
    Adachi M, Shirato S.
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1994 Feb; 38(4):392-9. PubMed ID: 7723208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
    Huang CQ, Carolan J, Redline D, Taravati P, Woodward KR, Johnson CA, Wall M, Keltner JL.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Comparison of SKP (semi-automated kinetic perimetry) and SASP (suprathreshold automated static perimetry) techniques in patients with advanced glaucoma].
    Nowomiejska K, Paetzold J, Krapp E, Rejdak R, Zagórski Z, Schiefer U.
    Klin Oczna; 2004 Mar; 106(1-2 Suppl):231-3. PubMed ID: 15510509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Component perimetry: a fast method to detect visual field defects caused by brain lesions.
    Bachmann G, Fahle M.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Sep; 41(10):2870-86. PubMed ID: 10967040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [First experience with the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter® on patients with ocular hypertension and preperimetric glaucoma].
    Hasler S, Stürmer J.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Apr; 229(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 22495996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Impact of diabetes on glaucoma screening using frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Realini T, Lai MQ, Barber L.
    Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2133-6. PubMed ID: 15522382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Pajarin AB, Pueyo V, Honrubia FM.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Nov; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Automated and semiautomated perimetry. Comparative trial of 3 devices (Baylor programmer, Friedmann Mark II campimeter, Octopus 2000 R.)].
    Pradines F, Delbosc B, Royer J.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1985 Nov; 8(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 3891833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Glaucoma screening with oculokinetic perimetry in general practice: is its specificity acceptable?
    Christoffersen T, Fors T, Waage S, Holtedahl K.
    Eye (Lond); 1995 Nov; 9 ( Pt 6 Su)():36-9. PubMed ID: 8729017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry.
    Wall M, Woodward KR, Doyle CK, Artes PH.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis.
    Sakai T, Matsushima M, Shikishima K, Kitahara K.
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.