These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
267 related items for PubMed ID: 17463097
21. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries. Janhom A, van Ginkel FC, van Amerongen JP, van der Stelt PF. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth. Akarslan ZZ, Akdevelioğlu M, Güngör K, Erten H. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study. Wenzel A, Borg E, Hintze H, Gröndahl HG. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 9161170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems. Hintze H. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model. Price C, Ergül N. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Platin E, Nair M. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan; 85(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 9474625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro performance of near infrared light transillumination at 780-nm and digital radiography for detection of non-cavitated approximal caries. Abogazalah N, Eckert GJ, Ando M. J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():44-50. PubMed ID: 28559050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Detection of cavitated or non-cavitated approximal enamel caries lesions using CMOS and CCD digital X-ray sensors and conventional D and F-speed films at different exposure conditions. Bottenberg P, Jacquet W, Stachniss V, Wellnitz J, Schulte AG. Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 21698985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The effect of developer age on the detection of approximal caries using three dental films. Syriopoulos K, Velders XL, Sanderink GC, van Ginkel FC, van Amerongen JP, van der Stelt PF. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 10455383 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study. Abreu M, Yi-Ching L, Abreu AL. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 15314000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography. Nair MK, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, May K, Ye F. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection. Harase Y, Araki K, Okano T. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries. Janhom A, van der Stelt PF, Sanderink GC. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 12087443 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of proximal caries in conventional and digital radiographs: an in vitro study. Rockenbach MI, Veeck EB, da Costa NP. Stomatologija; 2008 Jul; 10(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 19223710 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]