These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

351 related items for PubMed ID: 17467590

  • 21. [Fetal monitoring during the active second stage of labor].
    Dupuis O, Simon A.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Feb; 37 Suppl 1():S93-100. PubMed ID: 18206318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes between delayed and immediate pushing in the second stage of vaginal delivery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Szu LT, Chou PY, Lin PH, Chen C, Lin WL, Chen KH.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Feb; 303(2):481-499. PubMed ID: 32990782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Management of the second stage of labor: a review (Part I).
    Holland RL, Smith DA.
    S D J Med; 1989 May; 42(5):11-4. PubMed ID: 2658050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Why do supportive birth attendants become directive of maternal bearing-down efforts in second-stage labor?
    Roberts JM, González CBP, Sampselle C.
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2007 May; 52(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 17336819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The "push" for evidence: management of the second stage.
    Roberts JE.
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2002 May; 47(1):2-15. PubMed ID: 11874088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Are there inequalities in choice of birthing position? Sociodemographic and labour factors associated with the supine position during the second stage of labour.
    de Jonge A, Rijnders ME, van Diem MT, Scheepers PL, Lagro-Janssen AL.
    Midwifery; 2009 Aug; 25(4):439-48. PubMed ID: 18082298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Duration of the second stage of labor while wearing a dental support device: a pilot study.
    Matsuo K, Mudd JV, Kopelman JN, Atlas RO.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Aug; 35(4):672-8. PubMed ID: 19751326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The effect of uterine fundal pressure on the duration of the second stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Api O, Balcin ME, Ugurel V, Api M, Turan C, Unal O.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009 Aug; 88(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 19172441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Second stage: an artificial division.
    Huntley A.
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2000 Aug; (55):18-9. PubMed ID: 11189554
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.