These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1659 related items for PubMed ID: 17471088

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biomechanical study of pedicle screw fixation in severely osteoporotic bone.
    Cook SD, Salkeld SL, Stanley T, Faciane A, Miller SD.
    Spine J; 2004; 4(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 15246300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Stability of pedicle screws after kyphoplasty augmentation: an experimental study to compare transpedicular screw fixation in soft and cured kyphoplasty cement.
    Linhardt O, Lüring C, Matussek J, Hamberger C, Plitz W, Grifka J.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 16760780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Choice of bone cement augmentation techniques when sacral pedicle screw loosening].
    Yu B, Zhuang X, Li Z, Zheng Z.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 24(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 20187455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG, Hynes RA, McGilvray KC, Rodriguez-Canessa G, Lyons AS, Henson MA, Womack WJ, Puttlitz CM.
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Revision of the failed pedicle screw in osteoporotic lumbar spine: biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate augmentation.
    Derinçek A, Türker M, Cinar M, Cetik O, Kalaycioğlu B.
    Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2012 May; 23(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 22765490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biomechanical analysis of different techniques in revision spinal instrumentation: larger diameter screws versus cement augmentation.
    Kiner DW, Wybo CD, Sterba W, Yeni YN, Bartol SW, Vaidya R.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov 15; 33(24):2618-22. PubMed ID: 19011543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
    Inceoglu S, Ferrara L, McLain RF.
    Spine J; 2004 Nov 15; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of cannulated pedicle screws for fixation in osteoporotic spines and comparison of its clinical results and biomechanical characteristics with the needle injection method.
    Chang MC, Kao HC, Ying SH, Liu CL.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Aug 15; 26(6):305-15. PubMed ID: 23887077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A titanium expandable pedicle screw improves initial pullout strength as compared with standard pedicle screws.
    Vishnubhotla S, McGarry WB, Mahar AT, Gelb DE.
    Spine J; 2011 Aug 15; 11(8):777-81. PubMed ID: 21802996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of pedicle screws increases the initial fixation in osteoporotic spine patients.
    Sawakami K, Yamazaki A, Ishikawa S, Ito T, Watanabe K, Endo N.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Apr 15; 25(2):E28-35. PubMed ID: 22454185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 83.