These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

291 related items for PubMed ID: 17471748

  • 1. Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners.
    George EL, Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Goverts ST, Festen JM, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2362-75. PubMed ID: 17471748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
    Christiansen C, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Sep; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners.
    Rhebergen KS, Versfeld NJ, Dreschler WA.
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 18389414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE.
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The development of the text reception threshold test: a visual analogue of the speech reception threshold test.
    Zekveld AA, George EL, Kramer SE, Goverts ST, Houtgast T.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):576-84. PubMed ID: 17538101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL, Festen JM, Houtgast T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2295-311. PubMed ID: 17069325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Speech recognition and just-follow-conversation tasks for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with different maskers.
    Larsby B, Arlinger S.
    Audiology; 1994 Jun; 33(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 8042937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.