These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

733 related items for PubMed ID: 17471792

  • 1. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Kodak T, Lerman DC, Volkert VM, Trosclair N.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape.
    Slocum SK, Vollmer TR.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 25969379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Preference for reinforcers under progressive- and fixed-ratio schedules: a comparison of single and concurrent arrangements.
    Glover AC, Roane HS, Kadey HJ, Grow LL.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008 Sep; 41(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 18595281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. On the establishing and reinforcing effects of termination of demands for destructive behavior maintained by positive and negative reinforcement.
    Piazza CC, Hanley GP, Fisher WW, Ruyter JM, Gulotta CS.
    Res Dev Disabil; 1998 Sep; 19(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 9770252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Reinforcement magnitude: an evaluation of preference and reinforcer efficacy.
    Trosclair-Lasserre NM, Lerman DC, Call NA, Addison LR, Kodak T.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008 Sep; 41(2):203-20. PubMed ID: 18595284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A brief method for conducting a negative-reinforcement assessment.
    Zarcone JR, Crosland K, Fisher WW, Worsdell AS, Herman K.
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999 Sep; 20(2):107-24. PubMed ID: 10198942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Zarcone JR, Fisher WW, Piazza CC.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996 Sep; 29(2):247-50. PubMed ID: 8682741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.
    Lerman DC, Iwata BA, Rainville B, Adelinis JD, Crosland K, Kogan J.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997 Sep; 30(3):411-22. PubMed ID: 9316256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reducing escape behavior and increasing task completion with functional communication training, extinction, and response chaining.
    Lalli JS, Casey S, Kates K.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995 Sep; 28(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 7592143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Assessment of preference for varied versus constant reinforcers.
    Bowman LG, Piazza CC, Fisher WW, Hagopian LP, Kogan JS.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997 Sep; 30(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 9316258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of absolute and relative reinforcer value using progressive-ratio schedules.
    Francisco MT, Borrero JC, Sy JR.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008 Sep; 41(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 18595283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reinforcing efficacy of interactions with preferred and nonpreferred staff under progressive-ratio schedules.
    Jerome J, Sturmey P.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008 Sep; 41(2):221-5. PubMed ID: 18595285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 37.